AI Rate Professor

Art & Architecture

Alex Carrillo

ART201 · DRAWING · ARTDRAW · ART0144 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want disciplined drawing fundamentals and can work around hearing barriers; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard of hearingStrict traditional styleBoring for manyPatient with serious artistsBasics-focused
  • Reviews are few, mostly very old, and sharply split between treasure and avoid.
  • Serious art students value his basics drills and patience if they walk up to ask questions.
  • Many others call the class dull, harsh, and poorly suited to freer creative approaches.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Only one reported A appears among sparse data, and multiple students call .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings and comments range from chill easy work to hard random tasks, averaging a standard studio challenge.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; the recent multi-course review marks attendance mandatory.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

, but many older voices say never take him for fun or easy credit.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several students call grading hard or harsh with little room for alternate artistic approaches.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Studio drawing work is expected; comments stress doing the work rather than describing an .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A patient fundamentals coach for some, but many find him boring, rigid, and hard to communicate with.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Studio drawing courses revolve around producing work and technique drills more than formal exams.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in-person studio drawing, ranging from one recent multi-course fan to older harsh boring reviews.

Main concern

Hearing barriers, rigid style, and dull multi-hour sessions frustrate students seeking freer art classes.

What students said

“Not for someone who is there for easy credits. Enjoy art and he is great”
ARTDRAW
“Harsh on every level. Old can not hear does not like to hear any other takes on art”
ART201
“DO NOT SIGN UP FOR THIS CLASS! So boring”
DRAWING

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe formal exams, so assessment appears project-based and poorly documented.

Studio project workNo clear written exam details

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students discuss drawing tasks and policies.

Drawing assignmentsTechnique drills
“Also ask questions of how to improve the work, and he is a treasure trove. Drills the basics needed”
ARTDRAW
“he makes u do things that r randoma do not relate to drawing”
ART0144

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not for someone who is there for easy credits. Enjoy art and he is great. Yes, hard of hearing, but walk up and ask away.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 mostly old in-person art reviews with limited grade detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Good teacher, fair, easy, and nice”

👎

20/100

“Would never suggest this teacher to anyone. .”

🎨 Serious Artist Fit

70/100

“I took Alex's class for 4 different drawing courses. Not for someone who is there for easy credits”

🔇 Communication Barrier

25/100

“hard and can't hear..he makes u do things that r randoma do not relate to drawing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • very boring and dull
  • Drills the basics needed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • really easy n chill... do your work and your straight
  • He also grades really damn hard
  • Harsh on every level

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Feel

  • if you want to have a fun art class--SO BORING!
  • people would make of him behind his bad, I respect people
  • GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only eight reviews, mostly from 2005-2009 plus one 2023 comment, with thin grade data and little consistency.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART2014 reviews
ARTDRAW2 reviews
ART01441 review
DRAWING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values