AI Rate Professor

Industrial Technology

Elizabeth Cheung

IT0537 · ENGGEN131 · AT3804 · ENGTEK210 · EGDTEK0559 · IND110 · ENGGEN101 · EGDTEK210 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will show up and practice software; be cautious in flipped CAD courses with heavy checklists.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulClear feedbackGroup projects heavyFlipped classroom riskHands-on software practice
  • Most students praise her as , and .
  • CAD/software classes often feel flipped with heavy practice and .
  • and effort is expected, but many still report easy As when work is done.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many A and A+ reports and easy-A comments when homework and projects are finished, though .

In-person reviews drive easy-A evidence; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro projects and no-test sections feel light, while SolidWorks and and skill-heavy.

Online evidence is harder than the typical in-person ENGGEN experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that showing up and not procrastinating matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students would take her again for caring help and self-teach flipped sections.

Recommendation strength is high in person and weak in the lone online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and frequent A or A+ outcomes for completed work, though some call her picky on labs.

Format shift

as too hard for course value.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Project and homework load is manageable for many, but flipped CAD and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students repeatedly call her caring, clear, and not-teaching self-video complaints.

Format shift

In-person praise dominates; online sample is small and negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than traditional exams in many sections.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and software practice over classic tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly strong praise for caring teaching and projects in ENGGEN101, with some harsh flipped-class workload complaints in tech courses.

Main concern

and homework load with picky completion rules.

What students said

“Easiest class Ive ever taken. No tests and quizzes. Fun projects.”
ENGGEN101
“Professor Cheung is caring but provides a huge workload for a 3 unit class.”
ENGGEN131
“Very easy going class, easy A.”
EGDTEK0559

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online SolidWorks review calls the class ridiculously demanding and .

Main concern

High demand and .

What students said

“I had a 3D software course with her (Solidworks) and it was ridiculously demanding.”
ENGTEK210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several sections have no tests or quizzes and rely on projects, while and .

Few or no tests in some sectionsProject and homework basedChecklist quizzes requiring 100%

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, fun projects, or checklist-style quiz completion instead of high-stakes exams.

No tests and quizzesProject-basedChecklist quizzes
“No tests and quizzes. Fun projects.”
ENGGEN101
“ as complete unless you get 100%.”
ENGGEN131

Online

The only online and focuses on demand and grading severity.

“I don't know if she understands that a C on a transcript can kill your chances of getting into grad school.”
ENGTEK210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work and show up! She will help :)”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 , and easy-A patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Great professor who knows her stuff and does a great job teaching and explaining it to us.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Overall, a very time consuming class.”

🅰️ Grade Outlook

78/100

“Very easy going class, easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's amazing!
  • Genuinely wants to help her students learn.
  • She is insightful of learning barriers, and consistently creative with communication solutions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do it and you'll get an A.
  • The class isnt hard, its just ALOT of work.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very kind and empathetic.
  • Go to her Office hours , shes so helpful and sweet woman.
  • Really positive person and great teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years with consistent caring-teacher themes and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGGEN1017 reviews
EGDTEK05592 reviews
EGDTEK2102 reviews
IND1102 reviews
AT38041 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGGEN1311 review
ENGTEK2101 review
IT05371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 5 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values