AI Rate Professor

Art & Architecture

Amy Lay

ARTAPPRECIATIO · ARTA103 · ART103 · ARTHISTORY101 · OILPAINTING · ART101 · A201 · ART102 · ART201DRAWING · ART501 · ARTAPPERICATIO1 · ART201 · A101 · 74 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle heavy self-direction, vague instructions, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganizedUnclear assignmentsLate gradingTough graderUnresponsive
  • Frequent , and late or missing grades.
  • Many students say and getting an A takes real work, not .
  • , and mid-semester instructor changes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are common when students grind projects and , but tough grading and .

Both formats stress delayed grades; , online more often cites few graded items with surprise final marks.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content ranges from light , and time-consuming projects that many call hard.

Online art history or drawing can feel light on instruction but still stressful; and ART103 often feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping tanks grades, especially for studio work.

; in-person frequently requires presence and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

29/100

and recent comments strongly urge others not to pick her.

Online comments are almost uniformly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and surprise B after semester-long A estimates are common.

Format shift

Online students especially complain grades appear only at the end; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Some courses have few assignments; others pile reading, projects, and weekly work.

Format shift

Short online terms can feel light on graded items; studio and 5-week formats feel heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Caring personality is mentioned, but , and weak responsiveness dominate.

Format shift

Online quality is especially low; a minority of and feedback.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of projects, weekly quizzes, midterms, and finals depending on course.

Format shift

Online often emphasizes quizzes and few writing or ; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and art skill, many slam disorganization, canceled classes, and .

Main concern

, and frequent due-date changes.

What students said

“This professor is very unorganized and and explaining assignments”
A101
“she's extremely disorganized, extremely unclear with what she expects, and and due dates so often”
ART501

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and modules left locked or abandoned mid-term.

Main concern

, and grades withheld until the end.

What students said

“In 8 weeks of her class I learned absolutely nothing. She kept messing up & couldn't figure out how ”
ART201DRAWING
“there is no class. She never checks in, has not graded anything since week 2”
ART103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

QuizzesMidterms and finalsLecture-based testsProject critiques

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard; studio courses grade projects more than timed exams.

Lecture-based testsHard examsProject grading
“All quizzes and tests are based off of lectures so ”
ARTA103
“THE ! EVERYTHING ”
ART103

Online

Online comments mention easy quizzes and ; no lockdown or webcam policy stated.

Easy quizzesFew graded itemsWriting assignments
“Her quizzes and test are easy enough, however”
ART101
“ . 2 midterms”
ARTHISTORY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is very unorganized and and explaining assignments. Overall terrible professor, do not pick her!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Organization

34/100

“ . .”

📬 Responsiveness

28/100

“ to contact her, she has failed to respond each time.”

🎯 Recommendation Level

29/100

“do not pick her!”

Theme 1

📋 About Clarity & Organization

  • and and explaining assignments
  • and due dates so often that you lose track
  • She kept messing up & couldn't figure out how

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • you don't know your grade until the end, which sucks
  • it is not an easy A. She grades fairly, but tough
  • in order to pass with an A, you really need to work extra harder than usual

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • She's a sweet person though
  • and very flexible with due dates
  • Amy is a wonderful teacher and is an artist

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

74

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews span 2008-2022 with consistent themes on disorganization and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 512
3 out of 59
2 out of 510
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ART10315 reviews
ART50111 reviews
ART1027 reviews
ART1014 reviews
ART2014 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ART201DRAWING2 reviews
A1011 review
A2011 review
ARTA1031 review
ARTAPPERICATIO11 review
ARTAPPRECIATIO1 review
ARTHISTORY1011 review
OILPAINTING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5