Ali Naddafpour

ACCTG2 · ACCTG02 · ACC2 · ACCT2 · ACCTG002 · ACCT001 · ACCTG001 · ACTTG002 · ACCT002 · ACCG002 · ACCT1 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 90/100
RMP rating: 4.6/5
Take again: 88.89%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

Take him for Accounting 1 or 2 if you will put in weekly work—he makes a hard subject manageable and fair.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccounting gemFast email and Zoom helpLots of homeworkCengage and weekly examsClear real-life examples

Overwhelming majority call him one of the if you do the work.
Homework is heavy (often Cengage) with frequent exams, but materials and .
A couple of online reviews report poor communication and self-teaching; most online students still love him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are and samples, but accounting still demands real weekly effort.

work; online has both easy success and bare-pass stories.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Accounting content is repeatedly called hard or difficult, even when he makes it manageable.

Both formats treat the subject as hard; teaching quality is what differs.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory and participation matters.

In-person mostly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all recent reviews urge students to take him for Accounting 1/2 despite the workload.

; online has two strong avoid outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

, and late work accepted keep grading fair rather than harsh.

Format shift

In-person describes fair and recoverable grades; online outliers felt abandoned.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and several hours of study expected.

Format shift

; online also mentions test-heavy terms.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Praised for , and going the extra mile, with rare communication failures.

Format shift

In-person teaching is near-unanimously excellent; online is mostly strong with two bad terms.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

huge midterm-final combo.

Format shift

and Cengage; online also test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and excellent, with lots of homework and exams that reward practice.

Main concern

and frequent testing require steady study time.

What students said

“Professor Naddafpour is the .”
ACTTG002

“He is easy to get an A. He solves more than 10 exercises and problems at the end of each chapter.”
ACC2

“Put in the work and you'll earn an A.”
ACCTG2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise fast responses, Zoom help, and , while two report little guidance and slow or .

Main concern

What students said

“Mr n is fantastic & caring professor 100% online Accounting is very difficult His response is very fast”
ACCTG001

“For many weeks . We learned almost nothing from the course.”
ACCTG001

“Basically you are learning on your own. Not much substance.”
ACCT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and samples make assessment predictable if you practice.

Weekly or biweekly chapter examsCengage homeworkCanvas testsSample problems in class

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests every couple chapters, practice samples in class, and .

Chapter exams every 2 chaptersCengage homeworkSample questions in class

“lots of homework and weekly exams but very straightforward!”
ACCG002

“ than having a and final.”
ACCTG2

“He has like 5-6 exams, one for every 2 chapters instead of a mid-term and a final.”
ACC2

Online

and tests; some students felt underprepared without live guidance.

Canvas testsHomework heavyTest heavy

“you can cruze or if contact him he will be more than happy to spend time and go over every single question”
ACCTG002

“I would have liked more guidance on the material and maybe some more study aids.”
ACCT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ if you can, but ready to study and work.”
Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting excellent accounting teaching, heavy fair workload, and mostly strong recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Naddafpour is the .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“lots of homework and weekly exams but very straightforward!”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ ! Uses cengage tool for .”

📧 Responsiveness

85/100

“Responds within 3-4 hrs”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

His lectures go beyond the norm and give information that and detailed.
Connects to subjects to real life. Brings lots of examples to class
he makes managerial accounting so easy and relevant

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Acctg is hard but manageable if do the work
if you don't earn an A means you didn't put only a little effort
Put in the work and you'll earn an A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

Responds to emails very fast within 2 hours
Seriously the kindest, funniest, and most brilliant man.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews with many detailed recent comments and strong consistency aside from two negative online outliers.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG0014 reviews

ACCTG0023 reviews

ACCG0022 reviews

ACCTG22 reviews

ACC21 review

Show 6 more courses

ACCT0011 review

ACCT0021 review

ACCT11 review

ACCT21 review

ACCTG021 review

ACTTG0021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

B 5

C range

C 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values