AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gohar Petikyan

STAT227 · MATTH227 · MATH112 · MATHGEOM · MATH115 · MATH91 · MATH261 · MATH120 · STAT · MATH277 · MATH84 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Strong pick for a manageable math grade if and can handle an accent; .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and PatientClear ExplanationsEasy A PotentialAccent BarrierSelf-Study Needed
  • , and fair tests aligned with class.
  • A large , and hard to understand, so .
  • Homework and tests matter; and accessibility outside class are often mentioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many report A or A+ with homework and attendance; several call it an easy A if you put in time.

; online is more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Average difficulty is low; , but .

; online comments rate harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

participation and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

; praise for care and clarity outweighs organization complaints for most.

Recommendation is stronger in person than in the two online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Often described as fair or easy grader with and pass-friendly policies.

Format shift

; one online review called her a .

Workload

Light

68/100

but volume is often moderate; some report lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person workload comments dominate; .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many call her amazing and clear; a persistent minority say she cannot teach and has a thick accent.

Format shift

; online reviews are weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

; and may not always be collected.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person , and easy for an A, though accent and organization complaints persist.

Main concern

Accent, lateness, and occasional disorganization.

What students said

“she breaks down everything so clearly makes it feel like such an easy class, as long as you put in some time you should be able to get an A”
MATH227
“ and is not very good at explaining material”
MATH227
“She is so humble. Shes doing example all the time in class”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed-to-negative, citing disorganization, ungraded work, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Poor organization and communication online.

What students said

“She is the . If you are bad at math or even . You have to teach yourself everything.”
MATH277
“Ok”
MATH277

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and often match taught material; .

Test HeavyHomework Aligns With TestsExtra CreditFair Grading on Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as fair and aligned with lectures; .

Tests match lecturesHomework on testsExtra credit
“ ”
MATH115
“She is a lot of homework.”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews call the course test heavy but .

Test heavy
“ and .”
MATH277

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she breaks down everything so clearly makes it feel like such an easy class, as long as you put in some time you should be able to get an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing praise for care and clarity with organization and accent critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ , and helps you whenever you need help.”

👍 Recommendation

75/100

“ ”

📝 Easy A Path

82/100

“ if you want an easy A.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“ . Preached that if but she never collected it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • she breaks down everything so clearly
  • Great person terrible professor. Unorganized.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you put in some time you should be able to get an A
  • A is guaranteed with her
  • do the if she doesn't collect it its all on the test

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is such a caring and understanding professor
  • Always willing to spend 1 on1 time with each student
  • She is so humble.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years and courses with consistent split themes and detailed grade reports.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH22719 reviews
MATH1156 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH2774 reviews
MATH2613 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1252 reviews
MATHGEOM2 reviews
MATTH2272 reviews
STAT2272 reviews
1151 review
MATH1121 review
MATH841 review
MATH911 review
STAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 7 · A 7

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2