AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zarik Evinyan

MA115 · MATH112 · MATH115 · MATH81 · MATH2 · MATH261 · MATH238 · MATH1766 · MATH125 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if , and use her extra-credit safety nets.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyClear step-by-step teachingPartial credit graderTest-focused mathPolarizing online vs in-person
  • , and fair partial-credit grading.
  • A minority report impatience, humiliation, or .
  • , but homework, quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

, curves, and partial credit help, but comments say this is not for people hunting a free A.

; the online review describes a poor C experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Many , yet winter sessions and higher courses still feel tough without daily work.

In-person students split between easy-feeling and hard-subject comments; online difficulty was rated very high.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because missing class hurts understanding and success.

In-person reviews dominate attendance talk; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 60 percent would take her again, with .

Recommendation is mostly positive in person and negative in the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

73/100

Students , and extra-credit quizzes.

Format shift

Leniency evidence .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Daily or , but quizzes often count as rather than pure punishment.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework load; .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students call her the best math teacher they had, though a .

Format shift

In-person teaching is mostly praised; the online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple exams and a and quizzes often acting as boosters.

Format shift

; online only confirms a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and , though a few call her rushed or hard to follow.

Main concern

You still need steady study; and some students dislike pace or accent.

What students said

“She goes out of her way to make sure you succeed by providing lots of opportunities”
MATH125
“She grades the ; if you get the answer wrong but show work, you only get a slight deduction”
MATH238
“she isnt good at explaining, doesnt know the material, makes tests 90% of the so half the class didnt fail.”
MATH238

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative, citing lazy lectures, missing materials, and a .

Main concern

Online delivery quality and professionalism look unreliable from the available review.

What students said

“not only was this professor was very unprofessional but also lazy. She didn't give us the right material and told us "idk" ALOT”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent but usually aligned with classwork and cushioned by partial credit and .

Extra credit quizzesPartial credit on workCheat or flash cards sometimes allowedHomework-similar testsDropped lowest test

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reward shown work with partial credit.

4-6 exams plus finalFlash card allowedExtra credit questionsPartial creditDrop lowest test
“Each exam has 1 question for grade boosting. .”
MATH238
“You can have a flash card for quizzes and tests.”
MATH238

Online

Online review says the and materials were inadequate.

Last-minute finalTest heavy
“the and created it last second.”
MATH112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if your looking for an easy A but definitely if you want to lear”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting clear teaching, , and polarized experiences. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Her teaching style is so and never leaves anyone behind.”

🎁 Safety Net

73/100

“She goes out of her way to make sure you succeed by providing lots of opportunities”

⚠️ Polarizing Moments

40/100

“what really upset me is how a teacher can humiliate a student for asking a question.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy way
  • and so fare in teaching and grading
  • She's a very sweet lady.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if your looking for an easy A but definitely if you want to lear
  • and !!!
  • makes tests 90% of the so half the class didnt fail.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is the kindest professor I have ever had.
  • .
  • but horrible professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over many years give a rich, mostly consistent in-person picture, with a small negative minority and thin online evidence.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12512 reviews
MATH2389 reviews
MATH1155 reviews
MATH1124 reviews
MA1151 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH17661 review
MATH21 review
MATH2611 review
MATH811 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1