AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wendy Taub-Hoglund

MATH124 · MATH260 · MATH215 · MATH120 · STATWAY · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH225 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive under strict, high-pressure math instruction and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderStrict attendance enforcerHeavy homeworkPolarizing personalityTest-heavy math
  • Majority of , and .
  • Attendance is strict and .
  • A minority of serious students defend her as fair and excellent if you work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong grades are described as and .

All evidence is in-person because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly call content hard, rushed, or disconnected from lectures and homework.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple reviews say three absences can get you dropped and skipping class risks failing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and many reviews explicitly warn others not to enroll.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and picky partial-credit rules.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and long assignments appear constantly across reviews.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Some call her excellent, but , and condescension.

Format shift

All teaching judgments are in-person and highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Weekly tests, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply split but , and test difficulty.

Main concern

, and harsh exam grading can sink unprepared students.

What students said

“She is a bad tempered and rude teacher. She does not treat all his students the same.”
MATH125
“She . She is great at teaching and explaining.”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH225

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent, strict, and often described as harder or less forgiving than class practice.

Test heavyTough grading on work shownPop quizzesLittle makeup flexibilityLong timed tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and graded with little forgiveness for format or speed.

Weekly testsPop quizzesStrict scratch-work gradingNo makeup for missed work
“if she "can't follow" how you got your answer she will mark it wrong even if .”
MATH120
“ . Her homework is dumb long.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't subject yourself to her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting strict grading, heavy workload, and polarized personality. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

34/100

“She's extremely rude and has no compassion for her students.”

📉 Recommendation Level

28/100

“I suggest you do not take any classes with this teacher that .”

📝 Workload Pressure

24/100

“ and a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she teach very very bad
  • She is great at teaching and explaining.
  • Makes condescending remarks and acts like the students are stupid.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she will mark it wrong even if .
  • boy did I work for that

Theme 3

⛔ About Classroom Climate

  • She is a bad tempered and rude teacher.
  • You will be dropped if you skip class 3 times.
  • Complete apathy for students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

, detailed, and directionally consistent negative-leaning sample.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH1256 reviews
MATH2605 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
1251 review
MATH1241 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH2151 review
MATH2251 review
MATH2271 review
STATWAY1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1