AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tigran Mkrtchyan

STATS227 · MATH240 · TRIG0240 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive in and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized math teachingTest heavy and toughActive board workFast pacedHomework matters
  • Recent STATS227 review is extremely negative: .
  • Older MATH/TRIG reviews praise active board work, examples, and humor if .
  • Would-take-again sits at 0% with tough-grader and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and a reported D show an A demands heavy consistent effort and test success.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and difficulty ratings up to 5 make the material intellectually demanding.

All evidence is in person across STATS, MATH, and TRIG.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

The ; older reviews do not contradict strict structure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Official take-again rate is 0% and the strongest recent voice calls him the .

Older in-person MATH comments are warmer, but overall recommendation remains weak.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and a and homework.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews; modern STATS is especially harsh.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and warnings that .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Older students like active examples and humor; recent students cite no email replies and indifference to success.

Format shift

All in person; quality swings from 1 to 4.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy tags, proctored timed exams, and .

Format shift

In-person STATS and TRIG comments both stress exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

older courses liked interactive board work, while STATS227 , and poor support.

Main concern

and fast pacing can crush working students.

What students said

“ . .”
STATS227
“I like his active way of teaching.I passed the class after failing it once before.”
MATH240
“does a lot of examples and .”
MATH240

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and unforgiving if formulas are not memorized.

Proctored examsTimed testing windowsCheat sheets limitedHomework supports tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Proctored timed exams plus limited cheat-sheet value; .

Proctored examsFixed exam timesMemorize formulasDo the homework
“ and you have to take them at a certain time which makes it difficult for people who work.”
STATS227
“Don't be sucked into relying on the allowable 'cheat' sheets. If you don't have the formulas memorized by the .”
TRIG0240

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2009 to 2021, balancing older praise with a severe recent STATS review. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Support Gap

20/100

“ .”

🧪

28/100

“ and you have to take them at a certain time which makes it difficult for people who work.”

📝 Active Teaching (Older)

70/100

“He asks a lot of questions and students do a lot of board work, discuss and solve problems.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I like his active way of teaching.
  • does a lot of examples and .
  • very funny and intelligent guy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very fast paced course and he seems to not care about his students succeeding.
  • Lots of
  • It saved my grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • .
  • .
  • His accent is noticeable but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews span 2009 to 2021 with mixed eras; opinions conflict, so confidence .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2402 reviews
STATS2271 review
TRIG02401 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values