AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Zilberbrand

ALGEB115 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH245 · MTH115 · MATH110 · MATH238 · MATH227 · MATH270 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn math from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderTests mismatch teachingHard to understand accentLots of homeworkMakes students feel dumb
  • Many students say and .
  • Accent, speed, and condescending .
  • A minority pass with and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and few curves mean an A requires strong independent work and .

All evidence is in person; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Stats and algebra feel harder , and .

All difficulty comments come from in-person sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping tanks your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most students urge others to pick anyone else.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; limited partial credit and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and embarrassing students who ask questions.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

; homework matters but is often not aligned with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections draw heavy criticism for , and rude classroom tone.

Main concern

and many students drop.

What students said

“ . He doesnt know how to teach the right way because almost everybody was failing.”
MATH227
“He makes fun of anyone who asks questions and made me cry!”
MATH227
“If you are not good .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as harder or and lectures, with little review.

Test heavyHomework mismatchNo reliable study guideIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and graded strictly.

Tests differ from homeworkNo study guide oftenHarsh grading
“The assigns so its hard to pass.”
MATH227
“when it comes for he teaches.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY FOR THIS GUY! Can't understand his accent and he thinks that he is some special omnipotent professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, classroom tone, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Zilberbrand is not good teacher. .”

📉 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ . .”

🧪 Test Mismatch

32/100

“Whats on his test have nothing to do with what he has gone over in class nor what's on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are boring because its hard to understand him.
  • He just gives us formulas and expects us to know what to do with them.
  • , and Prof. Z. often makes arithmetic mistakes.

Theme 2

💬 About Classroom Tone

  • He makes fun of anyone who asks questions and made me cry!
  • He thinks his son is smarter than everyone..and he's like ten!!
  • Very rude and condescending.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • if you want to get a very good grade.
  • .
  • half of the class dropped in the middle of semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 detailed in-person reviews over many years show consistent negative patterns on teaching clarity and grading.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH11513 reviews
MATH22713 reviews
MATH1105 reviews
MATH2382 reviews
MATH2702 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ALGEB1151 review
MATH1051 review
MATH2451 review
MTH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 4