AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Fogel

MATH227 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

review describing ineffective teaching and harsh outcomes.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPoor TeachingTough GraderLecture HeavyHard TestsNot Recommended
  • Single review rates quality at rock bottom and difficulty at maximum.
  • Student says lectures do not prepare for tests.
  • and predicts C or worse for most students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

The only student reports a D and says most people will get a .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty is rated 5/5 with comments that .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and a .

Format shift

In-person-only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tags and comments flag lots of .

Format shift

In-person-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Student says he cannot teach and that long talking produces little learning.

Format shift

In-person-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Complaint centers on tests that do not .

Format shift

In-person-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person MATH227 review , and a D outcome.

Main concern

and grades appear punitive.

What students said

“Don't know how to teach and expects everyone to know the answers on the .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and poorly aligned with .

Hard TestsLecture MismatchTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from lectures.

Hard TestsTough Grader
“expects everyone to know the answers on the .”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't take him students you'll get an !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with consistent negative teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“Don't know how to teach and expects everyone to know the answers on the .”

📉 Grade Risk

8/100

“Don't take him students you'll get an !”

📚 Heavy Load Tags

25/100

“Lots of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Talks a lot but learns nothing.
  • Don't know how to teach

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Difficulty

  • you'll get an !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent review exists, so conclusions are directional but not robust.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2271 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values