AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

E M McGann

MATH227 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider her online if you want clarity and support, but beware the effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear When OnlineHeavy Assignment LoadTests Plus ProjectsHomework MisalignedMixed Recommendation
  • , and support.
  • In-person review cites massive testing and scores.
  • Recommendation splits hard by format and workload tolerance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

as a B because homework and .

Online review is more optimistic; final grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Both reviews rate difficulty high in an accelerated or heavily assessed calculus-style course.

Online still calls winter pace intense; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

In-person tags say skipping class means you will not pass, so .

Online ; in-person evidence drives the mandatory read.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student highly recommends her and the other explicitly does not, splitting recommendation by experience.

Online review is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, but and projects can undercut strong test averages.

Format shift

Online felt transparent; .

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

Multiple tests, quizzes, projects, and math class.

Format shift

; online review does not contradict difficulty.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Both sides say she can teach well, with online praise for humor and clarity outweighing in-person workload complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching reputation is stronger than the in-person workload experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and homework make exams central with heavy supporting assignments.

Format shift

Detailed assessment mix comes from the in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH227 piles tests, quizzes, projects, and in a B despite strong exam scores.

Main concern

Workload feels disproportionate and .

What students said

“5 tests, 12 quizes, 1 final, 2 projects, and 12 homework assignments.”
MATH227
“The and never aligns with the lecture .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Accelerated online MATH227 felt clear, funny, and and tests.

Main concern

Only one online review and course is still rated difficult.

What students said

“she really made the and . Her lectures were funny and she was always open to questions.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course uses frequent quizzes and ; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctoring software.

Multiple TestsWeekly QuizzesFinal ExamProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, two projects, and twelve homework sets.

5 Tests12 QuizzesFinal Exam2 Projects
“5 tests, 12 quizes, 1 final, 2 projects, and 12 homework assignments.”
MATH227

Online

Online winter section emphasizes clear tests and .

Clear TestsTransparent Criteria
“she really made the and .”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She teaches pretty well but the work is just not worth the time for a community college class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews with and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯

66/100

“Her lectures were funny and she was always open to questions.”

⛰️ Workload Overload

20/100

“5 tests, 12 quizes, 1 final, 2 projects, and 12 homework assignments.”

⚖️ Split Recommendation

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • she really made the and
  • She teaches pretty well

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • The and never aligns with the lecture
  • I managed to get an A and the final and a high B average on hw and ended with a B

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across formats give a useful split signal but remain too thin for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2272 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values