AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Wainthropp

ENG21 · TURKI101 · ENGLISH21 · ENG101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Skip if you want focused language instruction; comments show uneven engagement and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardOff-topic digressionsMixed English reviewsEasy-passible for someNot very engagedPolarizing Turkish instructor
  • Seven older and boring/off-topic.
  • Turkish sections drew dropouts and complaints about personal digressions.
  • Would-take-again rate is 0%, so recommendation confidence is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call the class easy passible if you do the work, but pickiness and dropouts still appear.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Average difficulty is moderate; content itself is not described as brain-burning.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least ; others give little detail.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% and multiple students .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One student calls him fair if you do the work; others note pickiness without extreme grade claims.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Comments stress dialogue and doing the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Praise for fairness is outweighed by boredom, digressions, and low engagement reports.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention work and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

unfocused Turkish classes with high dropout talk.

Main concern

Off-topic lectures and low teaching engagement in language sections.

What students said

“Spent whole class units on other subjects like Islamic circumcision and tea leaves, etc.”
TURKI101
“He didn't seem interested in teaching. Lots of personal stories of his life, etc.”
TURKI101
“He's nice and understanding as long as you do the work. He is fair.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; one old note mentions a final disrupted by illness.

Final mentionedDo the work

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly discuss class focus and whether doing the work is enough.

Final mentionedWork-based success
“he had a stroke, which meant people had to stay with the grade they had.”
ENG21
“Do the work n u'll b fine.”
ENGLISH21

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a teacher. We didn't learn much”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews with mixed quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He didn't seem interested in teaching. Lots of personal stories of his life, etc.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ as a teacher. We didn't learn much”

⚖️ Fairness When Present

52/100

“He's nice and understanding as long as you do the work. He is fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Spent whole class units on other subjects
  • Lots of personal stories of his life
  • Very slow talking, boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy passible
  • Do the work n u'll b fine.
  • Lots of students dropped out as he was so picky.

Theme 3

📚 About Course Focus

  • We didn't learn much
  • Lots of native Turkish speakers in the class for an easy "A".
  • there's a lot

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven mostly old reviews show mixed detail and inconsistent course focus, limiting confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG212 reviews
ENGLISH212 reviews
TURKI1012 reviews
ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values