AI Rate Professor

History

Kathleen Holland

POL001 · POLSCI019 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can write exactly as she wants and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderExact Wording OnlyHeavy ReadingNo Growth AllowedDo Not Take
  • Both reviews call her a .
  • .
  • ; one student dropped or withdrew.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

unless they match her exact wording.

Both online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings are high with an immense reading load and no interpretive freedom.

and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews report attendance as mandatory.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and both students strongly warn others away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; students say she marks down anything not her exact wording.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Immense reading load and high participation pressure with little flexibility.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she blocks growth and only accepts her own interpretation of answers.

Format shift

Low quality ratings in both online and in-person sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

and participation judged against her exact model.

Format shift

Evidence is limited but consistent across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and grading that blocks independent interpretation.

Main concern

She pinpoints every statement and wants word-for-word answers.

What students said

“ . she provides an immense amount of reading which is understandable, however she grades horribly.”
POLSCI019

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students describe a .

Main concern

Even if they are not worded her way.

What students said

“She's just a , and wants you to do things her specific way, even if you're right if she didn't like it no 100%.”
POL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Tough grading on written answers

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

a documented exam format.

Word-for-word grading
“she is constantly pin pointing every single statement you make and doesnt allow for you to interpret your own answer”
POLSCI019

Online

Online reviews focus on tough grading of written work, not a .

Strict answer matching
“wants you to do things her specific way, even if you're right if she didn't like it no 100%.”
POL001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . she provides an immense amount of reading which is understandable, however she grades horribly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting harsh grading and rigid expectations. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

⚖️

12/100

“She's just a , and wants you to do things her specific way, even if you're right if she didn't like it no 100%.”

📚 Teaching Quality

18/100

“doesnt allow you to grow as a student”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • wants you to do things her specific way
  • grades horribly

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Style

  • immense amount of reading
  • Get ready to read
  • doesnt allow for you to interpret your own answer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews from 2020 with strong agreement but tiny sample and limited grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POL0011 review
POLSCI0191 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1