AI Rate Professor

Agriculture & Natl Resources

Katrina Britner

AS621 · ANML621 · ANMLSC621 · ANMLSC630 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip unless you already know her style well; many students report safety and confidence harm.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySafety ConcernsHarsh FeedbackPolarizingHands-On HorsesYelling in Class
  • Most reviews warn about unsafe practices and .
  • A smaller set of students praise her as caring and confidence-building for beginners.
  • Would-take-again is under 30 percent despite easy content for some.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Content difficulty is low for many, but and confidence damage still hurt grades and experience.

and animal science classes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings cluster low; the struggle is style and safety, not abstract content.

All reviews are in person; no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; participation clearly matters in the arena.

In-person only; attendance reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

About seven in and yelling.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Little focus on letter grades; one A appears, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Practical riding labs, no textbooks, and .

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person horse classes.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Majority describe yelling, unsafe methods, and lost confidence; a minority call her caring.

Format shift

Polarized in-person only sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is hands-on riding and horse-care practice rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Hands-on and unsafe, yelling, confidence-killing instruction.

Main concern

Multiple students say safety guidelines are ignored and .

What students said

“She is an abusive teacher who shouldnt be teaching, dont risk yourself!!!”
ANML621
“She doesn't follow Pierce's safety guidelines and that makes her a danger to the students' safety.”
AS621
“she made me feel safe and able to trust such a beautiful animal.”
AS621

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; work is practical horse training.

Hands-on practical skills

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe practical riding and training techniques, not proctored exams.

Practical riding assessment
“she made sure they understood how to 1) be safe around a horse 2) learn about horse care 3) tacking and 4) beginning riding.”
AS621

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an abusive teacher who shouldnt be teaching, dont risk yourself!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting safety concerns versus minority praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 Safety Risk

20/100

“She doesn't follow Pierce's safety guidelines and that makes her a danger to the students' safety.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“0/10 would not take again.”

❤️ Positive Mentorship

75/100

“She had a profound impact on me so much I am the proud owner since 2016 of a Qtr. Horse!”

Theme 1

🚨 About Safety & Style

  • Puts the students in danger
  • Raises her voice a lot
  • abusive teacher who shouldnt be teaching

Theme 2

🐴

  • she made me feel safe
  • really wanted you to learn

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2019-2020 with detailed safety claims and a .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

AS6214 reviews
ANML6211 review
ANMLSC6211 review
ANMLSC6301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1