AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications-C.A.O.T.

O.R. (Lyn) Clark

EXCEL0233 · CAOT82 · CAOT97 · CAOT0232 · EXCEL · CAOT85 · CAOT0441 · EXCEL87 · EXCEL85 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Only take her if you already know the software well and ; otherwise look for a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing CAOT InstructorDisorganized GradingTough on DetailsHeavy Paper LoadKnowledgeable but Uneven
  • older reviews praise clarity and professionalism, newer ones call the class disorganized and harsh.
  • Workload and picky grading on minor issues are frequent complaints, especially in Access and Excel courses.
  • reviews, so most students do not recommend her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and papers, and picky deductions mean an A requires strict rule-following and heavy effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard office-software material, but uneven teaching and heavy paperwork make it feel harder than it should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews that .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Recent scored reviews say would not take again, and many call her the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments highlight tough grading and pickiness on minor issues.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of , and substantial work for the grade.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Quality ratings and comments are polarized between clear professional and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and rule-following more than clearly described exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CAOT and Excel courses draw mixed praise for knowledge and a detailed syllabus, but frequent criticism for , and weak Access teaching.

Main concern

and inconsistent teaching quality can hurt your grade and GPA.

What students said

“ , and low level of understanding regarding subject matter.”
CAOT85
“Very poor teaching at Access; you are on your own. Picky on minor issues.”
CAOT82
“ , and professional. She sticks to her syllabus.”
CAOT85

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one review notes practice tests that mirror the real test.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Few exam specifics; positively in one review.

Practice tests mirror exams
“She provides practice tests which are a mirrow image of the actual test.”
EXCEL85

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and low level of understanding regarding subject matter.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Polarized Teaching Quality

45/100

“Clark may have the credentials, but lacks teaching skills.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

📚 Heavy Workload

25/100

“Dr. Clark is a knowledgeable person, but you have to stick with her rules.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and professional.
  • Very poor teaching at Access; you are on your own.
  • THE !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Picky on minor issues.
  • if you didn't want to make your GPA very low.
  • You do have to do the work, it counts for 30% of your grade.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness & Support

  • When you ask for help... she denies it and takes it personal.
  • any of your questions.
  • Writes great books, and is always fair.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews span many years with polarized opinions and sparse grade data, so patterns exist but recent consensus is thin.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CAOT853 reviews
EXCEL2 reviews
EXCEL02332 reviews
CAOT02321 review
CAOT04411 review
Show 4 more courses
CAOT821 review
CAOT971 review
EXCEL851 review
EXCEL871 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values