AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Veronica Getskow

CHDEV10 · CD10 · CD3084 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Solid pick for Child Development if you attend every class and ; if you want a low-effort easy pass.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLecture-Based TestsAttendance CriticalClear CriteriaMixed Workload
  • Many students call her sweet, funny, and
  • Workload and difficulty reports split between easy A and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Several call it an easy A from lectures and common sense, while and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often common sense and lecture-based, though .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is repeatedly called imperative with skip-class warnings and full-length class sessions.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About 70% would take again; positives on care and clarity outweigh a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Clear criteria and , but and lower grades appear for some.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Typical load is about four tests plus a project or site visit; some report lots of homework and group work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many find lectures informative, funny, and helpful; .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Exams are central and drawn from lectures; assignments, CPR, site visits, and group work also appear.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most describe a sweet, clear, lecture-driven CD instructor with ; a , and avoidable.

Main concern

Inconsistent workload perception and a few strongly negative experiences.

What students said

“Really enjoyed the class this semester. I learned a lot of things that I can actually see myself using in the future.”
CHDEV10
“simply the . do yourself a !”
CHDEV10
“She's so sweet! & so easy! 4 tests, 1 ppt, & a group activity. Easy A!”
CD10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually mirror lectures and common sense; .

Lecture-based exams4 tests commonNo book requiredCommon sense questions

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students often report four tests plus a PowerPoint or group activity; tests follow lectures and common sense more than the book.

4 examsLecture-based testsSite visitCPR requirement
“ as well as common sense. You do NOT need the book.”
CD10
“Theyres around 4 exams, a site visit, Cpr and a proj.”
CD10
“4 tests, 1 ppt, & a group activity. Easy A!”
CD10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“best first class . what she lectures is on the test. She is very very helpful and resourceful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person Child Development reviews with mixed praise and criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

75/100

“what she lectures is on the test.”

❤️ Sweet and Helpful

80/100

“She's so sweet! & so easy!”

📚 Workload Split

45/100

“she does give heavy work for a Child Development class.”

⚠️

25/100

“simply the . do yourself a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures really are interesting
  • She's so sweet!
  • She is incredibly sweet and funny.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A!
  • Overall easy class tho.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

📌

  • dont miss class... attend class and you will do fine.
  • She doesnt let you out early

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven in-person reviews from 2011-2019 with and , but split opinions on workload and quality.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD105 reviews
CHDEV104 reviews
30841 review
CD30841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values