AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Lucas Mather

PHIL005 · PHIL20 · PHIL6 · PHIL006 · PHILO6 · PHIL06 · AABEC4912 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a rigorous logic challenge and and mandatory presence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLogic HeavyKnowledgeablePolarizingMandatory Attendance
  • some call him spectacular, .
  • Logic content is demanding, with , and pop quizzes.
  • and an A is far from guaranteed even when engaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Multiple D and , and hard logic work mean an A takes major effort and is not common.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Logic and truth tables get complicated fast, and many call the material hard to grasp.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

, and recent reviews warn strongly even though older fans exist.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and several D or C- outcomes show little grade cushion.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

So many papers, pop quizzes, and dense logic work keep the load heavy.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Praised as knowledgeable and sometimes spectacular, but , and polarizing.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Papers, pop quizzes, participation, and finals with truth tables and Venn diagrams all matter.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person philosophy and logic classes that many find engaging but hard, with mixed grades and .

Main concern

, and limited patience for struggling students.

What students said

“Hated this class. Hated the teacher. unless you want to waste your time.”
PHIL06
“Mather is spectacular. He is difficult, but he is the .”
PHIL006
“ .”
PHILO6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect , and a ; friendliness is limited.

Pop quizzesIn-person finalTruth tablesVenn diagramsMany papers

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention pop quizzes and a and Venn diagrams; .

Pop quizzesIn-person finalTruth tablesVenn diagramsMany papers
“the truth tables and Venn diagrams are doable until they get complicated both are on the final.”
PHIL005
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
PHIL006

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mather is spectacular. He is difficult, but he is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting polarization between hardcore fans and frustrated students. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He is a wonderful teacher and keeps you engaged.”

⚖️

24/100

“ , and a tough teacher not an easy class.”

🧠 Hard Content

30/100

“Logic is not an easy subject.”

👎 Polarized Recommendation

36/100

“ unless you want to waste your time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • keeps you engaged
  • His teaching style is fun and fair
  • sometimes he has difficulty bring it down to the students level

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • I loved his class, never missed one but failed with a D

Theme 3

⚠️ Classroom Rules

  • Don't question his theory - he'll ridicule you!
  • BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews spanning several years with mixed but detailed opinions give a solid, consistent picture.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL0062 reviews
PHIL062 reviews
PHILO62 reviews
AABEC49121 review
PHIL0051 review
Show 2 more courses
PHIL201 review
PHIL61 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1