AI Rate Professor

History

Carlone Harris

HIS52 · HIST11 · HISTO345 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

, but the only recent online review strongly advises against her.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Format FeedbackCondescending Online ToneEngaging In PersonLow Sample SizeHistory Courses
  • One recent online review is strongly negative about tone and flexibility.
  • .
  • Sample size is tiny and experiences diverge by format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

; difficulty scores are mixed and .

Online review is negative on experience; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

60/100

Difficulty ratings lean moderate-to-low, but evidence is thin and mixed by format.

Online difficulty felt higher; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online listed attendance as mandatory; .

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and the most recent detailed review is harshly negative.

Negative recommendation comes from the online review; in-person comments are older and sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students barely discuss grading fairness, so leniency cannot be confirmed beyond middling signals.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; difficulty scores suggest a moderate load overall.

Format shift

Online felt tighter on time; in-person reviews omit workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

In-person praise is thin and old, while the recent online review calls the experience the worst.

Format shift

Online tone is strongly negative; in-person comments are brief positives.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment breakdown is provided in comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Two brief older in-person comments call her a great, fun teacher with little detail on workload or grading.

Main concern

Reviews are old and very short, so positive claims are weakly supported.

What students said

“Great teacher, knows how to teach and have fun with it.”
HISTO345
“great teacher”
HIST11

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online reviewer found her unsympathetic to time limits, high-school-like in structure, and .

Main concern

Perceived lack of understanding for online students and a condescending communication style.

What students said

“probably the less understanding professor Ive ever had. Doesn't seem to understand the because of time restrictions.”
HIS52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

No Clear Exam PolicyFormat-Specific Experiences

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

testing rules.

No Exam Policy Stated
“great teacher”
HIST11

Online

Online comments focus on tone and .

No Exam Policy Stated
“Something tells me she teaches at high school level you can tell by the way she structures her class and her .”
HIS52

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“probably the less understanding professor Ive ever had. Doesn't seem to understand the because of time restrictions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting format split and thin detail. Credibility rating: Low.

💻 Online Experience

25/100

“The worst”

🏫 In-Person Praise

70/100

“Great teacher, knows how to teach and have fun with it.”

🚫

30/100

“No”

Theme 1

🌐 About Online Teaching

  • teaches at high school level

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • Great teacher, knows how to teach and have fun with it.
  • great teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews total, split by format, with older thin positives and one recent detailed negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIS521 review
HIST111 review
HISTO3451 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1