AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alvin Kim

MATH103 · P1165 · MATH60 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take him if and can handle a ; avoid if you need a soft, supportive classroom climate.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderAmazing LecturesMixed ReviewsThorough ExplanationsTest Heavy
  • while one scathing review cites public embarrassment and zero care.
  • Tagged as and test-heavy across courses, so grades require real work.
  • if and can handle high difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and high difficulty mean an A takes .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Math content is described as difficult with test-heavy and lecture-heavy pacing.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; others do not contradict that pattern.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two of three students strongly recommend him for .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and a 1/5 quality .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Test-heavy and lecture-heavy tags suggest .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Two and thorough; one reports rude, uncaring classroom behavior.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy tags and straightforward tests .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math and one report of public shaming with no support.

Main concern

One student reports being embarrassed for asking questions and feeling the professor does not care.

What students said

“Professor Kim is very thorough on explaining "WHY". He is very dedicated and very patient.”
MATH60
“Professor Kim is an excellent math teacher and .”
P1165
“If you ask a question in his class, he will embarrass you in front of the class, not answer your question, and continue on with the lecture.”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are test-heavy and can be hard, though one student called them straightforward.

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as heavy and sometimes hard, with one note that they match lectures.

Test HeavyStraight Forward Tests
“The .”
P1165
“ ”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Kim is very thorough on explaining "WHY". He is very dedicated and very patient.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity versus one severe climate complaint. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Lecture Clarity

68/100

“Professor Kim is an excellent math teacher and .”

⚠️ Classroom Climate Risk

20/100

“If you ask a question in his class, he will embarrass you in front of the class, not answer your question, and continue on with the lecture.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very thorough on explaining "WHY"
  • very methodical and organized

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is very dedicated and very patient.
  • doesn't conduct any behavior that shows he cares how his students do

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2016-2019 with mixed polarity and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1031 review
MATH601 review
P11651 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1