AI Rate Professor

Computer Science-C.S.I.T.

Alfredo Gonzales

CS575 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

; the only available report says he does not teach the relevant material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-Topic LecturesIrrelevant ContentLecture HeavyNot RecommendedLow Engagement
  • The only review says lectures often detour and .
  • and received an Incomplete.
  • , but teaching value is rated poorly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Course difficulty rating is low, but the Incomplete grade and poor teaching make an A .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Reported difficulty is very low, but that seems tied to weak teaching rather than rich easy content.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only and calls the teaching off-topic.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

the only review.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Workload

Light

70/100

Tagged lecture heavy with little mention of .

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Student says he digresses and fails to teach relevant subject material.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

60/100

Reviews do not detail assessment; only lecture-heavy teaching is mentioned.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review describes lecture-heavy classes that wander off topic and .

Main concern

Students may get little relevant instruction despite showing up for lectures.

What students said

“He often detected from his lessons. He doesn't teach much of relevant subject”
CS575

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He often detected from his lessons. He doesn't teach much of relevant subject”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review focused on off-topic lectures. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He often detected from his lessons. He doesn't teach much of relevant subject”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“No”

📚 Lecture Style

30/100

“LECTURE HEAVY”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He often detected from his lessons.
  • He doesn't teach much of relevant subject

Theme 2

📉 About Outcomes

  • No
  • Incomplete

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short 2018 review exists, so conclusions rest on a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CS5751 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1