AI Rate Professor

Education

Steven Steinberg

ENGLISH101 · EDU0348 · ED203 · ENGLIS21 · EDU203 · EDUCA0276 · ENG28 · ENG0299 · ENG21 · EN0292 · EDUCATION203 · EDU201 · EDUC203 · ENG · ENG0295 · ENGLISH21 · ENG101 · EB1203 · EDUCATION · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a supportive writing or education mentor and will use rewrites; avoid if and ironclad organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay Rewrite FriendlyFlexible DeadlinesHard HandwritingDiscussion HeavyPatient Mentor
  • Most students call him kind, patient, and excellent for learning to write with rewrite chances and flexible due dates.
  • A minority report messy handwriting, , late grades, and harsh outcomes in English 21.
  • Education and writing classes reward participation, peer editing, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students say easy A via rewrites, peer editing, and flexible due dates, though a few got D or F and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable writing and education discussion; challenge comes from volume of .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and helps, but and focus more on turning work in.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Large majority of comments strongly recommend him despite a 50% would-take-again rate and some harsh outliers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Rewrites, flexible deadlines, and mentoring tone make grading forgiving for students who engage, with some tough grammar pickiness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Regular paragraphs and , but work is usually described as manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most call him amazing, patient, and inspiring; a .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Essays, peer editing, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and education courses with , and occasional tough criticism of handwriting and grade lag.

Main concern

Hard-to-read handwriting, for some, and rare reports of .

What students said

“Definitely an easy A, if you get a poor grade or even a B to get an A.”
ENG28
“the whole class is based on class discussions and you can turn in . no dead lines.”
EDU203
“ . He is very difficult to understand and his hand writing is very hard to read !”
ENG21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays with rewrites and .

Essay BasedTake-Home Midterm/FinalRewrite AllowedIn-Class Essay OptionPeer Editing

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes use progressive writing assignments, peer editing, and .

Rewrite EssaysTake-Home FinalIn-Class EssayNo Strict Tests
“ . He's always there to help you. Easy A if you learn from the peer editing and .”
ENG28
“ . No tests!”
ED203
“ for it!!”
ENG28

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you learn from the peer editing and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 in-person reviews, balancing strong mentoring praise with organization and handwriting complaints. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Writing Mentorship

84/100

“If you want to learn how to write essays, he is the teacher to take.”

🔁 Grade Recovery

82/100

“ if you get a poor grade or even a B to get an A.”

✍️ Handwriting Friction

40/100

“His handwriting is very difficult to read.”

👍 Overall Recommendation

76/100

“Fantastic Teacher! .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful and passionate.
  • He's a and assignments.
  • Puts 100% into his teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Definitely an easy A
  • you can turn in . no dead lines.
  • Due dates are REALLY lenient.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • His handwriting is very difficult to read.
  • he doesn't return the works and grades until the very last day of the semester
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews over many years with consistent praise for supportiveness and repeated notes on handwriting and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EDU2036 reviews
ENG215 reviews
ED2034 reviews
EDUC2033 reviews
EDUCATION2033 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG283 reviews
ENGLISH213 reviews
EDUCA02762 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
EB12031 review
EDU03481 review
EDU2011 review
EDUCATION1 review
EN02921 review
ENG1 review
ENG02951 review
ENG02991 review
ENGLIS211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values