AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ron Remsburg

PHIL1 · PHIL12 · EUROPEANPHIL · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL1214 · GREEKPHIL · PHILOSOPHY1 · PHIL14 · PHIL014 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you like philosophy and , and study hard for exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyTest focusedPassionate philosopherRambling styleAttendance sensitive
  • He is deeply knowledgeable and passionate, especially for philosophy majors.
  • and tricky wording.
  • Organization and rambling lectures frustrate students who just want a clean GE experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A , and tough exam performance.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Philosophy concepts and as difficult or advanced.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

because he repeats himself, while others say missing class tanks your chance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Philosophy enthusiasts love him, but many others find the lectures and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Several students call tests tough or tricky, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

64/100

Often few or , but heavy studying for a small number of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Passion and , yet rambling, unorganized delivery divides students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Many sections revolve around a few major tests and little day-to-day graded work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person philosophy lectures reward attentive students who enjoy deep discussion and .

Main concern

, and heavy reliance on lectures make the course risky for casual students.

What students said

“His class has no assignments and no . You have 3 tests and the final.”
PHIL014
“ and answers require critical thinking.”
PHIL12
“One of the .”
PHIL12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are often described as hard, tricky, or carefully worded.

Test heavyTricky multiple choiceEssay questionsLecture dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay-style questions from lectures.

3 tests plus finalTricky multiple choiceEssays given in advance sometimesLecture and notes heavy
“You have 3 tests and the and you have to guess which is the most right.”
PHIL014
“ and answers require critical thinking.”
PHIL12
“To get an A in the class you should read the , and write the .”
PHIL014

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily one of the wisest teachers I have ever had! and answers require critical thinking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person reviews, capturing the passion-versus-difficulty split. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Fantastically passionate professor, one of the .”

🧠 Course Challenge

32/100

“Toughest . It's interesting, but defiantly not a class for someone new to the subject.”

📝

34/100

“His class has no assignments and no . You have 3 tests and the final.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“If you are into philosophy, he is great. If you are just showing up for a grade, it is no picnic.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • detailed lectures
  • , and also very open for questions.
  • his lectures are self-indulgent and often rambling.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got like a 100% in the class with no studying.
  • so be careful

Theme 3

📚

  • TEST HEAVY
  • no assignments and no

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews spanning many years show a consistent polarized pattern around lectures and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL128 reviews
PHIL143 reviews
PHIL0142 reviews
PHILOSOPHY2 reviews
121 review
Show 5 more courses
EUROPEANPHIL1 review
GREEKPHIL1 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL12141 review
PHILOSOPHY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values