AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mark C. Johnson

PHILO06 · PHILO42 · PHIL1 · PHIL20 · PHILO1 · PHILOS1 · PHIL35 · PHIL5 · PHILONE · PHIL6 · PHILOSOPHY1 · PHILO6 · PHIL42 · PHILOSOPHY2 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him if and ; do not expect an easy A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHilarious LecturesNote-Taking CriticalTough On EssaysClear ExplanationsSlow Grading
  • textbook alone.
  • Essays and and slow to return; some students .
  • but many call him inspiring and if you show up and engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many report tough essay grading and ; an A .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Material and lectures are long and complex; students say you must pay close attention and .

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Exams come from lecture notes, so missing class costs .

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students praise humor and clarity, though a and organization.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Often fair with , but essays and and can frustrate students.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Detailed notes, readings, several papers, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Hilarious and clear for most students; a few find him disorganized, slow to grade, or .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of and multiple papers, sometimes paper-heavy sections.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person philosophy with humorous, lecture-driven teaching, , and occasional frustration over slow or strict grading.

Main concern

Long and delayed grade posting.

What students said

“He's a funny guy. He makes his lectures interesting and gives out a lot of examples.”
PHIL1
“he's a hard, but . You must really understand the material well for you to get a good grade on the essays.”
PHIL5
“he takes forever to grade stuff too.”
PHIL35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually track lectures and notes; friendliness varies by term, with some open-note cards and some riddle-like questions.

Lecture-based examsSometimes multiple choiceIndex card allowed in some termsEssay heavy sectionsStudy guides

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some terms allow a notecard, others feel tricky or essay-heavy.

Lecture-based examsNotecard sometimes allowedEssay componentsStudy guides
“ in class.”
PHIL1
“ and you can use an index card of .”
PHIL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Johnson is hilarious! Totally inspiring on all kinds of levels. He's very passionate about teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 in-person reviews, highlighting humor, notes, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“very cool teacher... if ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“If you want !”

📝

42/100

“He .”

⏱️

40/100

“it really should not take almost a whole month after a !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's Funny, interesting, knowledgeable.
  • He's so chill, relates things to the simpsons

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall this class is not easy, most people got C's
  • he is a hard, but

Theme 3

📓

  • if you don't have a book
  • What he blabs is on the test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews over many years give a consistent picture of humor, note dependence, and .

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL19 reviews
PHIL357 reviews
PHILOSOPHY13 reviews
PHIL422 reviews
PHIL52 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PHILO62 reviews
PHIL201 review
PHIL61 review
PHILO061 review
PHILO11 review
PHILO421 review
PHILONE1 review
PHILOS11 review
PHILOSOPHY21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values