AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andranik Arutyunyan

MATH112 · MATH105 · MATH0466 · MATH115 · MAMATH · MATH125 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn math independently and can handle strict classroom rules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProThick accentStrict attendancePolarizing math teacherSelf-study heavyTough grader
  • Reviews and rude hard-to-understand instructor
  • Heavy accent and fast pace
  • and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Homework and notes can secure a pass or A for prepared students, but and speed block free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Math content is intermediate; difficulty spikes when lectures are fast or .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and as non-negotiable.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and many warn others not to enroll despite a minority of fans.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and complaints and respect rules dominate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of homework and note study are expected, though some call the class easy if work is done.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Accent, speed, and alleged rudeness outweigh praise from students who adapt to his style.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework, classwork, notes, and tests all matter; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person lower-division math with , and a thick accent that some adapt to and others cannot.

Main concern

Communication barriers plus strict or rude classroom climate for many students.

What students said

“he can't speak English well... so many dropped out.”
MATH125
“WORST. TEACHER. EVER. yells at students for NO reason.”
MATH105
“ ... Takes you step by step with each and every section.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove special proctoring; , and self-study.

Tests from notes and homeworkHomework-heavy cushionNo proctoring details given

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes and homework, with no explicit proctoring software mentioned.

Study notesDo homeworkDrop lowest test mentioned once
“Do the hw and attend every class and you'll surely pass.”
MATH115
“as long as you do all your home work the .”
MATH0466
“believe me. if u study all his notes and .”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If the concepts or to seek out a tutor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews, highlighting accent barriers, strictness, and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Communication Barrier

35/100

“Professor Andranik knows material but have difficulty interpreting or translating his knowledge to the student because he can't speak English well.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

25/100

“yells at students for NO reason... is often late & VERY VERY RUDE.”

📘

48/100

“You will have to teach yourself a lot of the concepts if you hope to get a passing grade because he goes very quickly.”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“ ...especially if math is not your strongest subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • has a THICK accent
  • talks to the board, not the class
  • VERY STRICT and HATES tardiness

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do ALL the homework and classwork and you will pass
  • get the grade you deserve

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • Run the other way!
  • would give zero if i could

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four in-person reviews over many years consistently surface accent, strictness, and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH12510 reviews
MATH1158 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
MAMATH1 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH04661 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1