AI Rate Professor

History

G.W. Britton

HIST87 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip if you care about academic sources; one sparse review already flags credibility concerns.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWikipedia as SourceNot RecommendedMandatory AttendanceQuestionable Scholarship
  • Only one dated review attacks source quality via Wikipedia use.
  • .
  • and high difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Difficulty rated 4 with no grade relief mentioned, so an A is unlikely without real effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Student rated difficulty 4 and offered no praise for content clarity.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Student would not take this professor again after the Wikipedia source issue.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and high difficulty.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload was not described in the single review.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

Mid quality score paired with a sharp hit on scholarly standards.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and assignments in the comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as a source and .

Main concern

Reliance on Wikipedia undermines course credibility.

What students said

“He uses Wikipedia as a source. Enough said.”
HIST87

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He uses Wikipedia as a source. Enough said.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting source credibility and . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Source Credibility

25/100

“He uses Wikipedia as a source. Enough said.”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“No”

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Professor QUALITY rating: 3”

Theme 1

📚 About Scholarship

  • He uses Wikipedia as a source. Enough said.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2016 review with minimal detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST871 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values