AI Rate Professor

Industrial Technology

R. Martin

AST1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

If you like cars and want a hands-on intro engine class, he looks promising, but one review is not enough to bank on.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHands-on enginesCar cultureFun lab classBeginner auto path
  • Only one review exists, so conclusions are thin.
  • Student loved beginning engine building and V8 tear-down/rebuild work.
  • in cars.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The sole review does not detail grading ease, only that the hands-on work was engaging.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Framed as a beginning engine-building course aimed at students starting auto work.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The reviewer strongly recommends the class for car-interested students as the most fun course taken at Pierce.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Hands-on tear-down and rebuild work is described as fun, not as .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Student calls it the most fun Pierce class and praises open auto Q&A plus real engine work.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Review emphasizes lab tear-down and rebuild activity rather than exams.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person AST1 review describes a fun beginning engine-building class with tear-down and rebuild of V8s and open auto Q&A.

Main concern

Only a single review, so , and .

What students said

“this was by the most fun class I have taken so far at Pierce. If you are into cars, this is the class for you to start with.”
AST1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do ; only hands-on engine work is described.

Hands-on engine labNo exam details reported

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; the review focuses on in-person V8 tear-down and rebuild labs.

Hands-on V8 rebuildOpen auto questions
“V8's that you get to tear down and rebuild is the icing on the cake, any auto question you can come up with is fair game in this class.”
AST1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are into cars, this is the class for you to start with.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Experience

78/100

“Took Professor Martin for beginning engine building during Spring of 2014 and this was by the most fun class I have taken so far at Pierce.”

🔧 Hands-On Learning

80/100

“V8's that you get to tear down and rebuild is the icing on the cake.”

Theme 1

🚗 About Class Content

  • beginning engine building
  • V8's that you get to tear down and rebuild
  • any auto question you can come up with is fair game

Theme 2

❤️ About Enjoyment

  • most fun class I have taken so far at Pierce
  • If you are into cars, this is the class for you to start with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2014; positive but too thin for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AST11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values