AI Rate Professor

Personal Development

Mita Noor

PD40 · PERSDEV040 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.2

The decision

if you can self-manage an easy PD class without relying on instructor clarity.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear directionsSlow email repliesSelf-teach onlineEasy gradePoor communication
  • PD40 content is easy and grades are attainable with the book.
  • and unresponsive communication.
  • One strong early review praises bonding and motivation; later online comments improve somewhat.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Multiple students say it is easy to get a good grade if you complete the work independently.

it easy; one pure online review is positive but light on grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students say you are not learning much new material and difficulty ratings stay very low.

Both formats describe very easy PD content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

; success depends on independent work and email communication.

Online mentions office appointments by email; other reviews focus on .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Easy grade attracts some, but poor communication and .

; most other reviews are critical of instruction quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Good grades are common if work is submitted, though .

Format shift

In-person-tagged online experiences note penalties for .

Workload

Light

75/100

Work is repeatedly called easy with low intellectual load.

Format shift

Consistent across formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Helpfulness appears in spots, but and weak communication dominate.

Format shift

One positive online review contrasts with mostly negative earlier online-management complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is assignment and discussion-board driven; .

Format shift

Reviews emphasize assignments and discussion boards over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most reviews describe easy work but , and poor online-class management during her early years.

Main concern

and weak communication while still penalizing mistakes.

What students said

“her directions on assignments are unclear, she is generally unresponsive to questions or concerns”
PD40
“It's really easy to get a good grade, as long as you can do the work without asking any questions whatsoever.”
PD40
“Ms. and goals that resulted in our class becoming BONDED.”
PD40

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One summer online review says she replies within 24 hours, is helpful on grades, and offers office appointments.

Main concern

Single recent-ish positive online sample may not represent earlier online chaos.

What students said

“she is a great professor each time I had a question about my grade or within 24 hours”
PERSDEV040

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly document exams; experience centers on assignments and discussion work.

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews highlight assignments and discussion boards; .

AssignmentsDiscussion board
“she took our discussion board down after we started helping each other!”
PD40
“as long as you have the book you will be fine”
PD40

Online

Single online review discusses assignment help and .

Assignment-focusedEmail support
“each time I had a question about my grade or ”
PERSDEV040

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's really easy to get a good grade, as long as you can do the work without asking any questions whatsoever.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews with Low credibility due to small sample, age, and mixed experiences.

📗 Easy Independent Grade

80/100

“It's really easy to get a good grade, as long as you can do the work without asking any questions whatsoever.”

📧 Communication Problems

30/100

“her directions on assignments are unclear, she is generally unresponsive to questions or concerns”

❤️ Bonding Class Moment

85/100

“Ms. and goals that resulted in our class becoming BONDED.”

🧭 Better Online Support Sample

70/100

“replays to emails within 24 hours she was also available to students in person by setting up an appointment”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the work is for the most part easy because you aren't learning anything new
  • It's really easy to get a good grade
  • just don't rely on her instruction for anything.

Theme 2

📢 About Communication

  • SUPER POOR communication skills
  • and vague, if they were ever answered at all
  • she took our discussion board down after we started helping each other!

Theme 3

❤️ About Motivation

  • Very motivating.
  • I really miss that class.
  • she is a great professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only six mostly old reviews with split tone and limited grade data reduce reliability.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PD405 reviews
PERSDEV0401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values