AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marcos Enriquez

MATH112 · MATH245 · MATH1234 · MATH125 · MATH225 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and prefer lower-level math; avoid MATH245 based on reviews.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing by Course LevelHeavy HomeworkStrict and SternBook-Copy LecturesBelief in Hard Workers
  • Lower-level courses (112/115/125) get warmer reviews about learning and support.
  • MATH245 reviews are , and attitude.
  • Students who want free grades dislike him; serious workers sometimes succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Grades and study; several students report low success rates and failed or dropped sections.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Average difficulty is high, and MATH245 especially is called intentionally hard and mismatched to teaching.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but class notes and board work matter enough that front-row attendance is urged.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; many others say stay away, especially for MATH245.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Does not give free grades; multiple reports of hard or mismatched tests and low pass rates.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated comments about excessive homework and high study demand.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Step-by-step and supportive for some lower classes; useless or error-prone lectures for others, especially 245.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

match taught material.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

developmental/intermediate algebra can feel strict but rewarding, while MATH245 is widely described as unhelpful and unfair.

Main concern

, and reports of unhelpful lectures or mismatched tests.

What students said

“there is a lot of homework but you will learn”
MATH125
“Stay away from this prof!”
MATH245
“I LOVE THIS Professor!!!”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often described as hard or unrelated .

Hard testsTests may not match lecturesNo calculators in some classes

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from lectures; calculators banned in at least one class.

Hard examsMismatch with taught materialNo calculators sometimes
“ he taught”
MATH245
“no calcuators make class even worse than it is.”
MATH245

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay away from this prof! Gives an excessive amount of hw and he taught.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting course-level split and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“he is very neat when he writes and goes step by step”

🚫 Avoid MATH245

25/100

“ !!!!!”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Gives an excessive amount of hw”

👍 Support for Serious Students

70/100

“Doesn't give away good grades for free, but will reward your work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes step by step
  • All he does is Re-writes examples from the book on the board
  • uses the word intuitively too much

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • there is a lot of homework but you will learn
  • INTENTIONALLY makes the class IMPOSSIBLE
  • I progressed from C on the I STUDIED.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he really believed in me
  • he is really a softy
  • takes pride in failing students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

12 in-person reviews with clear course split and recurring themes, but older dates and no grade distribution limit certainty.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2456 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH1121 review
MATH12341 review
MATH2251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values