AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Jill Sohm

MICROBIO20 · MICRO020 · BIO108 · MICRO20 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend, use the study guides, and study details; be cautious outside that context.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Micro LecturesStudy Guide DrivenApproachable HelpTricky Detail TestsMixed Course Feedback
  • For MICRO20, most students praise clear lectures, study guides, and fair, no-surprise quizzes.
  • The material is still challenging, so grades reward consistent study more than .
  • One Ecology visiting-prof review is extremely negative and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Most say you can do well by studying the guides, but the material is hard and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Microbiology content is repeatedly described as hard .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Students stress attending labs and lectures to stay aligned with what is tested, without a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most Micro students recommend her for clarity and help, .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

and study-guide aligned, though some call questions detail-heavy or tricky.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students , and real study time for quizzes and exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most and approachable; outliers call her boring or unfriendly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Assessment centers on quizzes and exams tightly tied to lectures and study guides.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair with study guides, while one non-Micro review is harshly negative.

Main concern

A minority report boring slides and ; the BIO108 review is an .

What students said

“ and easy to understand. Material is hard yet she makes it interesting.”
MICRO20
“She gives you a study guide with what you will be tested on and if you study, you will do good.”
MICRO20
“probably the .”
BIO108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly straightforward if you study the guide, with occasional complaints about tricky wording.

Study GuidesLecture-Based QuizzesStraight From PowerPointDetail-Heavy Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures, though one student found questions confusing.

Study GuidesStraight From PowerPointDetail-Heavy Questions
“ . No surprises.”
MICRO20
“Exams are straight from powerpoint. ”
MICROBIO20
“ .”
MICRO020

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives you a study guide with what you will be tested on and if you study, you will do good. No tricks, very straight forward.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting Micro clarity, study-guide testing, and one strong Ecology outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

📘

72/100

“great teacher. and makes the material understandable.”

📝 Study Guide Fairness

64/100

“95% of the .”

⚠️

20/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • and easy to understand.
  • if you need help.
  • She uses Powerpoints to focus on the important material

Theme 2

📈 About Tests and Difficulty

  • Material is hard yet she makes it interesting.
  • . No surprises.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • She is boring. Reads off the powerpoint.
  • probably the .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

61/100

Evidence confidence

Eight fairly detailed reviews from 2012-2014 show a outlier.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MICRO205 reviews
BIO1081 review
MICRO0201 review
MICROBIO201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values