AI Rate Professor

Art & Architecture

Lara Minassian

ART · ART204 · ART201 · ART501 · 2DDESIGN · ART2D · ARTM20 · DARTACCT · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are already a strong art major with 20+ hours a week to spare and thick skin for harsh critiques.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderNegative critiquesTime-consuming projectsStrict attendanceNot beginner-friendly
  • and graded like professional-level work.
  • , and demotivating for non-majors.
  • and public critiques add pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Harsh professional standards and vague guidance make As very hard for average students.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Projects consume 20+ hours each and feel far beyond intro-level expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Missing .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students urge others to run; only a few art lovers recommend her.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Grades hard on craftsmanship and concept; favors skilled drawers and can reverse prior approvals.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Multiple reviews cite 10-20+ hours per project with heavy studio demands.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and uninspiring despite a few positive outliers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and public critiques rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio art classes demand , and public critiques with .

Main concern

Expect professional-level drawing standards, negative feedback, and .

What students said

“Grades hard and expects you to be able to draw like a professional artist”
ART501
“ unless you had 20+ hours .”
ARTM20
“You can only miss 2 classes, then she drops your grade by a full letter grade.”
ART2D

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is studio projects and critiques; .

Project-basedPublic critiqueRedo projects sometimes allowed

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critique based with strict craftsmanship standards.

Project critiquesHard project gradingTime-heavy assignments
“puts up all drawing after you finish to be critiqued by everyone”
ART501
“She grades hard, making sure you followed these guidelines.”
2DDESIGN

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE THIS TEACHER UNLESS YOU NEVER WANT TO DRAW AGAIN! ”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person art , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

⏰ Workload Overload

15/100

“ unless you had 20+ hours .”

📉

22/100

“Grades hard and expects you to be able to draw like a professional artist”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“Otherwise RUN VERY FAR AWAY”

📋

15/100

“You can only miss 2 classes, then she drops your grade by a full letter grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaching style is HORRIBLE
  • boring and uninspirational

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • expects you to be able to draw like a professional artist
  • I got a C on a project that I spent 10 hours on
  • she grades she's very biased

Theme 3

⏱️

  • 20+ hours
  • You can only miss 2 classes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with and workload, though a few strong positives reduce total certainty.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ARTM204 reviews
ART2012 reviews
DARTACCT2 reviews
2DDESIGN1 review
ART1 review
Show 3 more courses
ART2041 review
ART2D1 review
ART5011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values