AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David J. Rodabaugh

MATH · MATH227STATS · STAT227 · MATH112 · MATH238227 · MATH238STAT227 · MATH238 · MATH0483 · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH225 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you only need the grade, not deep learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A StatsOpen Notes ExamsCorny JokesCalculator HeavyPolarizing Teacher
  • Many students call Stats an easy A with open notes and calculator programs.
  • Teaching quality and unprepared.
  • ; success depends on attending and taking detailed notes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Open notes, calculator programs, and light study routines routinely yield A or B grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is mostly calculator-driven Stats with low conceptual demand for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but students say detailed in-class notes are needed to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but many warn you will learn little or .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Open notes, curves, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Multiple reviews report no homework and mainly tests plus notes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some praise care and humor, while .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades center on a few open-notes multiple-choice tests and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person Stats and math sections swing between easy open-notes calculator classes and complaints of rambling, outdated prep.

Main concern

You may pass without learning, and some sections felt unprepared or confusing.

What students said

“Easy A!! If you . But if it !!”
MATH227
“ :)”
MATH227
“Admitted that he hadn't taught pre-calc in years. Rambles on and on. .”
MATH260

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and calculator programs, making them student-friendly.

Open NotesOpen BookCalculator ProgramsMultiple Choice

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book with calculator programs and multiple choice.

Open NotesOpen BookCalculator AllowedMultiple Choice
“Lets you .”
MATH227
“ :)”
MATH227
“ , but you can use notes and he has reviews before the tests.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A!! If you . But if it !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 in-person , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Knowing how to use calculator for the questions=EASY A.”

📚 Open Notes Safety Net

84/100

“ :)”

⚠️ Polarized Teaching

48/100

“he doesnt even know what hes doing and does not no how to solve problems.”

👍

52/100

“If you;re not great in math or afraid of .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A!! If you .
  • SUPPER EASY! just study on your own
  • You'll find yourself getting A's without knowing it.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tries way too hard to be funny.
  • Rambles on and on. .
  • He is so nice and is willing to help his students.

Theme 3

📝

  • Lets you .
  • Everything we do is in the calculator.
  • , and you will do well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two detailed reviews spanning many years show consistent themes despite polarized quality scores.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH22717 reviews
MATH2604 reviews
MATH2382 reviews
2271 review
MATH1 review
Show 7 more courses
MATH04831 review
MATH1121 review
MATH2251 review
MATH227STATS1 review
MATH2382271 review
MATH238STAT2271 review
STAT2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values