AI Rate Professor

Art & Architecture

Camille Cornelius

ARTHIST · ART111 · ART103 · ART0174 · ART101 · ART202 · DRAW202 · ART305 · ART201203 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you like art discussion and ; skip if you need a light filler class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Reading LoadHelpful CritiquesLiberal PerspectiveStudio Can Be StrictInteresting But Demanding
  • Many students praise her knowledge, humor, and .
  • Art history style sections often pile , and museum work.
  • Drawing grades can feel harsh for non-realist artists, while completing work on time still yields easy As for others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some sections reward completing work for an easy A, but and strict drawing grades.

; there are no online-flagged reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from approachable studio fun to dense art history reading that challenges many students.

; there are no online-flagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Studio and face-to-face timing matters, while some history comments describe limited campus meetings.

; there are no online-flagged reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Strong praise for personality and learning outweighs complaints about workload and a few harsh grade stories.

; there are no online-flagged reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Fair and perfect scores when earned, but drawing critiques can feel strict and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews stress , and weekly reading piles.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often call her thoughtful, funny, knowledgeable, and motivating despite uneven course design complaints.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Blend of papers, tests, drawings, critiques, and museum or reading assignments depending on course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Reviews are labeled in person and describe both studio art and heavy lecture or Moodle-style history courses with mixed workload and .

Main concern

Reading and writing volume can feel excessive, and .

What students said

“if u do all drawings (6-7 of them) on time (not hard to do) u will get easy A.”
DRAW202
“Lots to read.”
ART103
“The way she grades only lets perfect artists get an A in the class.”
ART202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and books; papers and projects also weigh heavily.

Timed TestsLecture And Textbook BasedPapers And Museum Work

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects rather than proctoring tools.

Timed TestsEssay HeavyLecture Detail Matters
“Figure how hard can online tests be - given 90 minutes? Not as easy as it seems.”
ART103
“4 essays, 3 difficult tests, a trip to the museum, and TONS of reading.”
ART103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the personality as well. Her class is fun .take her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person labeled reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Very intelligent professor and enlightening class. She does a great job sparking your interest in Art and really motivates your interest in the subject.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Way too much for this kind of class. Also, she strongly emphasizes politics over artistic considerations.”

🅰️ Grade Path

58/100

“As far as you are doing all home work and ”

🖌️ Studio Strictness

40/100

“if you are not a because she is very critical and will grade you low.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are interesting. She challenges your critical thinking!!
  • Shes funny too!
  • She is Very Good with he Critiques, and You can learn a lot from her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is harder than expected, but still very easy.
  • She is great but it is hard to get an A in her class.
  • if you read the material.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • SO MUCH READING. At least 50 pages per week, 4 projects and 3 tests.
  • and writing. 3 unit class should have been 5.
  • The online class is too much work to do if you have other classes, a job, responsibilites, etc.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across many years and courses give rich, mixed detail with consistent workload and teaching themes.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART10317 reviews
ART2022 reviews
ART01741 review
ART1011 review
ART1111 review
Show 4 more courses
ART2012031 review
ART3051 review
ARTHIST1 review
DRAW2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values