Kim Susie

FLORA1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 28/100
RMP rating: 2.0/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know floral design and need only a seat, because the single review reports weak guidance and an unhelpful style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRepetitive ProjectsLittle GuidanceUnclear CommunicationNot Supportive

Only one old review describes rigid, repetitive floral design work.
Students get few guidelines and struggle with board notes and clarity.
Tone is clearly negative on personality and instructional support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

No grade outcome is stated, and the review focuses on poor guidance rather than free or easy marks.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

, but the work is described as repetitive and under-explained rather than intellectually deep.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The single review is negative on guidance, clarity, and demeanor, with no recommendation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

in the only review.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students all do the same flower arrangements with limited variety, suggesting routine studio work rather than a crushing load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

The reviewer cites wrong flower names on the board, little guidelines, hard-to-understand speech, and an unfriendly style.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears to center on repeated floral arrangements rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The sole in-person FLORA1 review says projects are repetitive, guidelines are thin, and the instructor is and .

Main concern

Little guidance, repetitive same-flower arrangements, and communication issues.

What students said

“She gives you little guidelines. .”
FLORA1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She gives you little guidelines. .”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She writes the name of flowers wrong on the board. Sometimes hard to understand.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

🌸 Class Structure

40/100

“Ms. Kim always buy the same flowers. Everybody has to do the same arrangements.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She gives you little guidelines.
She writes the name of flowers wrong on the board.
Sometimes hard to understand.

Theme 2

🌸 About Course Work

Ms. Kim always buy the same flowers.
Everybody has to do the same arrangements.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2012 review exists, so confidence in any pattern is very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 50

Course coverage

FLORA11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values