AI Rate Professor

English

Nina Hackett

ENGLISH101 · ENGL028 · ENG28 · ENGLI101 · ENGL28 · ENG028 · ABCEN28 · ENGL098 · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENGL01 · ENG · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid Nina Hackett unless you are already strong in English and can teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear ExpectationsSoft-SpokenHarsh GraderAvoid
  • Most students report chaotic classes with and constantly changing plans.
  • ; work is often lost and the .
  • A few motivated students succeed, but the majority urge others to switch professors.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few students got As via curve or self-motivation, but , and finals that decide the grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is analytical literature with pop quizzes and heavy material, made harder by disorganization and soft speaking.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students say you must show up and sit up front just to hear her.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The large majority of and describe the class as a waste of time.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report unfair grades, favorites, lost quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and last-minute oral reports are common complaints.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students , and say they learned more from the internet.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pop quizzes and a high-stakes final dominate; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English classes are widely described as , and demoralizing, with and harsh or opaque grading.

Main concern

Lost work, no syllabus, and .

What students said

“the and did not prvide a syllabus for the class”
ENG101
“she looses quizzes, she changes the curriculum 1/2 way through the semester”
ENGL28
“ . like EVER. she likes to humiliate people in the middle of class”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent pop quizzes and a or feedback.

Pop QuizzesFinal-HeavyLost QuizzesIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final that can determine the whole grade; some students report lost quizzes.

Pop QuizzesFinal Determines GradeLost Quizzes
“The !”
ENG101
“she ”
ENGLISH101
“ ”
ENGL28

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 , and strong avoidance; credibility High.

📉 Teaching Quality

20/100

“This teacher is just flat-out terrible.”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“Do yourself a favor and . Hackett.”

📂 Organization

18/100

“completely disorganized, does not tell you 80% of ”

🎧 Clarity

22/100

“i couldn't hear a freakin word coming out of her mouth”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not provide a syllabus
  • NO TEACHING AT ALL, I learned NOTHING
  • she is insulting, and gets upset if you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The !
  • you can get A if
  • grades unfairly, she was crap

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • she likes to humiliate people in the middle of class
  • she is very rude and closed-minded
  • It seems as if this woman's abitions is to see people fail

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

46 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2004-2012 show strong consistency on disorganization and poor teaching despite a few positives.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 512
1 out of 524

Course coverage

ENG10123 reviews
ENG287 reviews
ENGLISH1014 reviews
ENG0282 reviews
ENG1022 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL282 reviews
ABCEN281 review
ENG1 review
ENGL011 review
ENGL0281 review
ENGL0981 review
ENGLI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values