AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Harland

CAL260 · MATH260 · MATH263 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and will do the homework; be aware a minority found lectures weak.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesHelpfulLots of homeworkReasonable testsPolarized reviews
  • Several students call him an exam scores
  • He assigns a lot of as the
  • Two short reviews slam his lectures as poor or bad, so experiences split

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One student got an A and over 95 on each exam .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is still solidly challenging .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority praise him as a comments.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report and an A when they follow lectures carefully.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

He assigns a lot of as the .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

, but two students call lectures poor or bad.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair exams, while two brief reviews call lectures poor.

Main concern

Lecture quality is inconsistent across students.

What students said

“his so helpful and his teaching is so easy just with sitting and listing to his lecture”
CAL260
“ , and he really tried to make you understand the material.”
MATH263
“Poor lecture”
MATH263

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as reasonable and scoreable with .

Reasonable testsHigh exam scores possibleHomework heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests are reasonable and not too easy; one student scored over 95 on each exam.

Reasonable testsNot so easyHigh scores possible
“ so easy but I got over 95 at each exam!”
CAL260
“ and overall, he was a great teacher.”
MATH263

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“John Harland is the greatest math professor alive!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity and polarized lecture views. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

66/100

“his so helpful and his teaching is so easy just with sitting and listing to his lecture”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“I got over 95 at each exam!”

⚠️ Lecture Polarization

35/100

“Poor lecture”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • John Harland is the greatest math professor alive!!!!
  • his teaching is so clear
  • , and he really tried to make you understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got A in his class very easy just with sitting and listing to his lecture
  • He assigned a lot of homework, but doing problems is the .

Theme 3

👎 Negative Takes

  • Poor lecture
  • Bad lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five older 2011-2012 reviews show clear themes but split between strong praise and brief negative lecture takes.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2633 reviews
CAL2601 review
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values