AI Rate Professor

Anthropology & Geo Sciences

Christiann Hammons

ANTHR121 · ANTH121 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you love anthropology topics and can self-motivate through uneven lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHit-or-Miss LecturesSubject KnowledgeableHard GraderHelpful When PresentInteresting Content
  • Two glowing reviews praise his knowledge, stories, and helpfulness, while one calls him a bad teacher who rarely shows up.
  • Content can feel boring even when the anthropology topics themselves are interesting.
  • as fairly hard; one student ended with a B and said ease would have offset the poor teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student explicitly said he grades pretty hard and finished with a B, so an A needs real effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings stay low to mid and topics are interesting, though lectures can make material feel dry.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one review implies he often skips class himself.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two students rave about learning and personality, but one strongly advises against him for poor teaching and hard grades.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

A and produced a B rather than an easy pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; focus is more on lecture quality than volume of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Knowledge and storytelling impress some students, while others find him boring, absent, and uninterested.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments give almost no detail on how and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students split between calling him a and calling him boring, absentee, and a .

Main concern

Inconsistent presence and frustrating B.

What students said

“He is a great professor. He knows his subject very well.”
ANTHR121
“He is a bad teacher, never shows up to class, does not seem like he wants to be there.”
ANTH121
“ and he's always there when you need to ask questions”
ANTHR121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this class was so cool. alot of interesting stories about tribes and witchcraft and stuff. he was a really cool, kick back guy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2011; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He is a great professor. He knows his subject very well.”

⚠️

30/100

“He is a bad teacher, never shows up to class, does not seem like he wants to be there.”

📈

35/100

“If he were easy all this would not matter, but he grades pretty hard. I ended up with a B :(”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He give good lecturer.
  • He somehow made it really boring.
  • really cool, kick back guy.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • and he's always there when you need to ask questions
  • does not seem like he wants to be there

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very old reviews (2008-2011) with mixed polarity and little grade or .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHR1212 reviews
ANTH1211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values