Charles Eastman

ANTHR101 · ANTH101 · ANTHR121 · ANTHRO102 · ANTHRO111LAB · ANTH111 · ANTHR0147 · ANTHRO101 · ANTH102 · ANTHR102 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 22/100
RMP rating: 2.2/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.4

The decision

unless you must; if stuck, read the book hard and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesSelf-Centered TangentsTextbook-Based TestsHarsh Essay GradingAvoid If Possible

Many students call lectures useless, boring, or full of personal tangents.
and tests he previews the day before.
, and strong avoid warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some say an A is possible by reading and reviewing previewed test material, but many , and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can be a piece of cake if , yet tests and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Avoid

22/100

A large share of reviews if desperate.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Multiple students describe hard essays, little partial credit, and low class averages.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

68/100

Several sections revolve around a few tests and reading rather than constant assignments.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is boring, off-topic lectures that do not prepare students well.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests with multiple choice and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person anthropology students largely describe dull lectures and weak teaching, with a minority saying an A is possible by memorizing the book.

Main concern

, and unhelpful teaching make the course a poor use of units for many.

What students said

“ . 90% will get Cs. Waste of units and very bad teacher.”
ANTHR101

“Memorize the book and you will get an A. class average is a C with minimal B's and 1 A.”
ANTHR101

“HORRIBLE, all he does is talk about New York... .”
ANTHR102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are long and textbook-heavy; some say he previews material, while .

Textbook Heavy TestsTest Preview Day BeforeMultiple Choice Plus EssayCurve Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays; he sometimes previews content the class before.

Textbook Heavy TestsTest Preview Day BeforeMultiple Choice Plus Essay

“The tests are 99% textbook, and he tells you what is going to be on it the classtime before.”
ANTHR101

“3 tests, each with 50 multiple choice and 1 essay question, except for .”
ANTH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . 90% will get Cs. Waste of units and very bad teacher.”
Voice snapshots generated from 20 in-person , and avoid warnings. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“His lectures are useless. Memorize the book and you will get an A.”

👎

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“HE GRADES SO HARD ITS SO !!!”

📖

42/100

“Easy A if you review what he says is going to be on the test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Side tracks all the time. BORING as heck
goes on and on about his personal life
only about talking about himself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

class average is a C with minimal B's and 1 A
SO HARD

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Advice

unless desperate
!!
GET OUT.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty in-person reviews spanning 2005-2011 are detailed and directionally consistent on weak teaching quality.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 56

3 out of 53

2 out of 53

1 out of 58

Course coverage

ANTHR1017 reviews

ANTHRO1013 reviews

ANTH1012 reviews

ANTHR1022 reviews

ANTH1021 review

Show 5 more courses

ANTH1111 review

ANTHR01471 review

ANTHR1211 review

ANTHRO1021 review

ANTHRO111LAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Charles Eastman

x x unless you must; if stuck, read the book hard and x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Recommended

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👎 x x

⚖️ x x

📖 x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

⚠️ About Student Advice

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you must; if stuck, read the book hard and .

👎

⚖️

📖