AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Kimberly Jones

ADMIN1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

If you want a clear, engaging Administration of Justice professor who makes the single 2010 review.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyApproachableMakes class interestingGuest speakersClear examplesWilling to help
  • Students praise her as amazing, interesting, and approachable.
  • She uses real examples and .
  • Only one old review exists, so the sample is thin.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

No grade details; moderate difficulty with strong teaching, so an A likely needs solid effort rather than .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty rated moderate and the student found the material interesting rather than crushing.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The sole student raves about learning a lot and even considering another class for fun.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

No grade outcomes or ; tone suggests supportive, fair teaching.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; focus is on interesting lectures and examples.

Format shift

In-person only; no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Student calls her amazing, approachable, and skilled at explaining with examples and guests.

Format shift

In-person only; one highly positive review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does and guest speakers.

Format shift

In-person only; assessment split not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and effective with examples and guest speakers.

Main concern

Single decade-old review limits how much to generalize.

What students said

“She is amazing! I learned so much from her class and she made it so interesting that I thought about taking one of her other classes for fun.”
ADMIN1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

“She shares great examples and gets you to really understand the subject.”
ADMIN1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is amazing! I learned so much from her class and she made it so interesting that I thought about taking one of her other classes for fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching and approachability. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is amazing! I learned so much from her class and she made it so interesting that I thought about taking one of her other classes for fun.”

🤝 Approachability

88/100

“ and willing to help you out.”

🎤 Classroom Enrichment

85/100

“She also gets guest !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She shares great examples and gets you to really understand the subject.
  • She also gets guest !

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • and willing to help you out.
  • I thought about taking one of her other classes for fun.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2010 with strong detail but no corroboration, grades, or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMIN11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values