AI Rate Professor

History

William Shila

HIST52 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take William Shila for an engaging History 52 experience if you will attend and keep up with notes and reading.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAwesome lecturerLoves the subjectNotes matterMust attendTake her
  • Both quality ratings are perfect 5s with low-to-moderate difficulty.
  • The , and you will love the class.
  • Sample is tiny and partly empty, so confidence stays limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Average difficulty is low and the detailed review frames success as attend, notes, and .

Evidence comes only from two in-person HIST52 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low and the student describes enjoyment more than heavy intellectual struggle.

Evidence comes only from two in-person HIST52 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The detailed review says you have to attend class and .

Evidence comes only from two in-person HIST52 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

The only substantive review ends with an .

Evidence comes only from two in-person HIST52 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

; low difficulty and .

Format shift

In-person only; no grade letters reported.

Workload

Light

68/100

Main work is attending, note-taking, and reading the book for tests.

Format shift

In-person only; textbook and notes are the stated load.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Student says she is awesome, loves the subject, and makes students love it too.

Format shift

In-person only; one empty second review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests based on class notes and .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person HIST52 feedback is strongly positive on enthusiasm and learning, with attendance and notes required for tests.

Main concern

Only one substantive comment plus one empty review.

What students said

“Professor Williams is AWESOME!! she loves what she teaches and you will love it too!!!”
HIST52
“you have to attend class and , and read the book for tests.... !!”
HIST52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and book reading; .

Note-based testsTextbook reading for tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests draw from class notes and the textbook; .

Note-based testsRead the book for tests
“you have to attend class and , and read the book for tests.... !!”
HIST52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Williams is AWESOME!! she loves what she teaches and you will love it too!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting enthusiasm and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Williams is AWESOME!! she loves what she teaches and you will love it too!!!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ !!”

📅

25/100

“you have to attend class and , and read the book for tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she loves what she teaches and you will love it too!!!
  • !!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to attend class and , and read the book for tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, one with no comment text, and older dates limit reliability despite consistent high ratings.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST522 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values