AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Oren Eisenberg

MATH240 · MATH125 · MATH0795 · MATH115 · MATH260 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Only take him if you need an easy math grade and ; if you want real instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot TeachEasy GraderSelf-Study RequiredConfusing LecturesMessy Board Work
  • Many students say he cannot teach clearly and .
  • Grades are often easy if you show up, participate, and teach yourself from the book.
  • Board writing and classroom control are frequent complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report easy tests and easy grades if they show up and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Lower-level math content is treated as easy, while confusion comes from teaching, not the material itself.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Showing up and participating is repeatedly tied to better grades, but .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against him for teaching skill even when they admit grades can be easy.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

He is often called an and participation even when lectures fail.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Light

70/100

Homework and tests are described as easy if you read the book; load is light relative to other math classes.

Format shift

In-person only; no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say , and sometimes does not know the material.

Format shift

In-person only; no online teaching evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Homework, participation, and doing most of the learning.

Format shift

In-person only; no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

weak instruction, so students rely on the textbook and peer help.

Main concern

, and unreliable explanations of hard problems.

What students said

“easy A, but you have to teach yourself because he is horrible at teaching.”
MATH125
“THIS PROFESSOR IS THE .”
MATH240
“Horrible. CANNOT teach at all! Unclear. Rude. Picks favs.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often called easy if and read the text, with little evidence of harsh proctoring.

Easy TestsHomework BasedNo Word Problems on Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy; one review notes no word problems on tests despite heavy practice.

Easy TestsHomework Based
“ and easy tests. Just do the homework and read the book and you'll do fine.”
MATH125
“ .. BUT ..”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easy A, but you have to teach yourself because he is horrible at teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching paired with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Horrible. CANNOT teach at all! Unclear. Rude. Picks favs.”

🅰️

78/100

“Easy A. Show up and read the text.”

📖

75/100

“easy teacher, but can't teach at all look at your book instead if you need help”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • CANNOT teach at all! Unclear.
  • his lectures are sort of confusing
  • and thinks everything in his head

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A, but you have to teach yourself
  • and easy tests.
  • if you are really bad or .

Theme 3

🧹 About Classroom Quirks

  • He writes like a 5 yrs old.
  • After each class he looks like a coal miner.
  • he always dirties his face by rubin the board then his face

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen in-person reviews from 2005-2010 consistently criticize teaching while agreeing grades can be easy.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1155 reviews
MATH1255 reviews
MATH2402 reviews
MATH07951 review
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values