AI Rate Professor

English

Paul Miller

ENGLISH101 · ENGL102 · ENGLISH84 · ENG21 · ENG102 · ENG101 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you want a and already write strongly.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadHard GraderUnclear ExpectationsLots of ReadingSkip If Possible
  • Many students report and writing for a 3-unit English course.
  • and vague assignment expectations are recurring complaints.
  • A minority praise that hard work builds real writing skill if you already write well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and missed tests that cannot be made up make an A costly.

; some comments mention online or hybrid sections.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Large reading loads, many essays, and .

; some comments mention online or hybrid sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed from comments.

All counted reviews are in-person tagged; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Many and .

; some comments mention online or hybrid sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a or quiz.

Format shift

Based on in-person tagged reviews; some describe online sections.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Tons of reading, many papers, and .

Format shift

Based on in-person tagged reviews; some describe online sections.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few find him helpful and passionate, but and weak support.

Format shift

Based on in-person tagged reviews; some describe online sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Reading, essays, research papers, and group work dominate more than a .

Format shift

Based on in-person tagged reviews; some describe online sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person tagged reviews , and uneven clarity; some hybrid or online-style sections appear in comments.

Main concern

Unrealistic workload and .

What students said

“Do not make the same mistake I did!!! He grades way too hard, and .”
ENG102
“ . WAYYY to much work for a 3 unit class.”
ENG102
“Horrible! I was prepared to work hard, but his workload was unrealistic for a 3-unit class.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments emphasize essays and papers; .

In-Class EssaysResearch Paper GateMissed Tests No Makeups

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe heavy essays, hard grading, and .

In-Class EssaysResearch Paper GateMissed Tests No Makeups
“If you don't get 70% on your research paper, you don't pass the class.”
ENG101
“I accidentally missed a test and he did not let me make it up, dropping my A to a B”
ENG102
“He gives a lot of in class essays and grades very hard.”
ENGLISH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

18/100

“WAYYY to much work for a 3 unit class.”

⚖️

22/100

“He grades way too hard, and .”

👎 Recommendation Level

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • WAYYY to much work for a 3 unit class.
  • his workload was unrealistic for a 3-unit class
  • assigns TONS of

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • He grades way too hard
  • once you get a low grade on a grade to not be higher then a B

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • He never clarifies his work
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews over several years consistently emphasize heavy workload and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1018 reviews
ENG1026 reviews
ENGLISH1014 reviews
ENG211 review
ENGL1021 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1