AI Rate Professor

Business Administration

Charlie Su

ALL · PAYACTG · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only care about an easy early-out class and can accept weak structure.

Best fit · Budget FirstRampant CheatingThick AccentNo EvaluationsLets Class Out Early
  • One detailed review calls the class a joke with
  • Uses state and federal publications instead of a textbook
  • Quality ratings are split and thin with almost no useful positive detail

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and early outs suggest an A is easy if you go along with weak standards.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Difficulty ratings of 1 and comments calling it a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state attendance rules, only that class often ends early.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Detailed review labels the class a joke over cheating and no evaluations, outweighing a bare positive score.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Students grade each other in pencil with reported .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Class lets out early and uses public publications instead of a heavy textbook load.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Thick accent, blocked evaluations, and a joke label drag teaching quality down despite one empty positive rating.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

main assessment detail given.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

In-person payroll accounting is described as a joke with , and early dismissals; one older rating is positive with no comment.

Main concern

Rampant cheating risk and lack of real classroom standards.

What students said

“No book.Just use State and Federal Pulications. Rampant cheating in class beccause students grade each other's work, which is in pencil. Has an thick accent. Does not let students fill out class evaluations!!! Always lets class out early. A JOKE!!”
PAYACTG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rampant cheating in class beccause students grade each other's work, which is in pencil. Has an thick accent. Does not let students fill out class evaluations!!! Always lets class out early. A JOKE!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting integrity concerns and light structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Classroom Standards

22/100

“Rampant cheating in class beccause students grade each other's work, which is in pencil.”

⏱️ Early Dismissal

78/100

“Always lets class out early. A JOKE!!”

📘 No Textbook Cost

80/100

“No book.Just use State and Federal Pulications.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Class Integrity

  • Rampant cheating in class beccause students grade each other's work, which is in pencil
  • Does not let students fill out class evaluations!!!
  • A JOKE!!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Has an thick accent
  • Always lets class out early

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews spanning 2005-2009 with one empty comment make credibility low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ALL1 review
PAYACTG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values