AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Kimberley Garmoe

HUM61 · HUMAN61 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel academically and want a brutal, high-effort humanities challenge.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedScattered LecturesVery HardHigh Drop RateAvoid
  • Two of three reviews urge students not to enroll because the class is chaotic and overwhelming.
  • Expectations are high and communication can feel intimidating or excessive.
  • One student enjoyed the challenge but still called it very difficult and not for average performers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students describe extreme difficulty, dropouts, and expectations far above a normal workload, with no easy-grade signals.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Comments call the class very hard, complex in vocabulary, and unsuitable for students below a solid B average.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Two and the third only recommends the class for students ready to work extremely hard.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students report very high standards and no sense of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews mention heavy expectations, extra work, and late-night emails that feel excessive.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

one says she tries to help, while , and a waste of time.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize overall difficulty and extra work but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person feedback is mostly negative, citing disorganization, scattered lectures, extreme difficulty, and a high dropout vibe.

Main concern

and heavy .

What students said

“DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT! I took her class in the fall and dropped it.”
HUM61
“ . cannot talk about one thing.. has scatter brains”
HUM61
“Great teacher, but very difficult class... if you are below a B average student”
HUMAN61

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students stress hardness and high expectations but .

High DifficultyUnclear Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

software or open-book rules; only high difficulty is clear.

High DifficultyUnclear Format
“very difficult class... if you are below a B average student, and you MUST be willing to work hard.”
HUMAN61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT! I took her class in the fall and dropped it... out of a class of 52 there were 11 left.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews from 2008-2009 with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . cannot talk about one thing.. has scatter brains”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“HARD.. !!! she is SO WEIRD!!”

🔥 Difficulty

14/100

“Great teacher, but very difficult class... if you are below a B average student”

Theme 1

📉 About Organization

  • she talks about random stuff and is very scattered
  • has scatter brains and expects you to be a a Dr

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very difficult class
  • expects you to do everything when she is in fact the teacher
  • her expectations is WAY to much

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Reaction

  • DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT!
  • back away!
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews exist, they are polarized but lean negative, and detail on assessments is thin.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HUM612 reviews
HUMAN611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values