AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Tannenbaum

ENGLISH101 · ENG3052 · ENGLI101 · ENG28 · ENGL102 · ENG21 · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGLISH28 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless no alternative; expect confusion, busy work, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnorganizedAlways LatePeer Review HeavyTough GraderBusy Work
  • , and ineffective at teaching English.
  • Peer review and unclear assignments dominate grading with tough, subjective standards.
  • A few students pass with B/A by grinding busy work, but learning claims stay very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some finish with A/B by doing all work, but and and unclear.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and unclear expectations make the course feel hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and missing peer reviews or class is treated as costly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The large majority and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Excessive reading, journals, peer reviews, and busy work appear across many reviews.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant themes are no teaching, disorganization, chronic lateness, and low learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals all carry weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English sections are repeatedly called disorganized, late-start, peer-review heavy, and low learning value.

Main concern

, and minimal useful instruction.

What students said

“This is the . He is boring,unexperience and very unfair with your grades.”
ENG101
“I did not learn anything in his class. It was just busy work.”
ENG102
“ . always late to class.”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes essays, peer review, reading tests (sometimes open note), and .

Open Note Reading TestsEssay HeavyPeer ReviewSame-Day Test And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-note reading tests for some sections and .

Open Note Reading TestsEssay TestsPeer ReviewBusy Work
“ and the work given in the class wasn't over whelming.”
ENGLISH101
“BE CAREFUL! is no right or wrong answers but it is NOTTTTTT true.”
ENG102
“ and .”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't know how in the world did he get a Masters in English. He is a nice guy but incompetent. I did not learn anything in his class. It was just busy work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person , and low learning value. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“His teaching skills are close to nothing. He needs to go back to school and learn how to spell simple words.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“Do not waste your time. This is the .”

⚖️

28/100

“He is a . It is hard to get an A”

📚 Workload

32/100

“ and homework. uses peer review to grade your work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not teach.
  • . always late to class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a
  • It's not too hard to get an A... he has a good attitude.
  • I managed a C with an average of A and B papers.

Theme 3

😩 About Frustration

  • LOTS OF BUSY WORK
  • sucked
  • don't get me wrong he is a cool guy, but just a hard teacher to deal with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven mostly detailed in-person reviews from 2004-2009 show strong negative consistency.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENG10111 reviews
ENGLISH283 reviews
ENG1022 reviews
ENG282 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGLISH1012 reviews
1011 review
ENG211 review
ENG30521 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGLI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values