AI Rate Professor

Business Administration

B Coleman

MAR11 · MRKT11 · INTROTOBUS · MARK11 · INTROBUS1 · BUSINESS1 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you can self-study the entire book; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBook-Based TestsDisorganized LecturesMixed ReviewsNice GuyMarketing Hard
  • Recent marketing reviews slam tests drawn from trivial book details not covered in lecture.
  • Older intro and easy, so experience may vary by course.
  • He is often described as nice but not an effective lecturer.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Marketing students report hard book-based exams and low scores even for strong students, despite easier intro-business notes.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Marketing content and testing feel unnecessarily hard, while older intro business comments call it easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Strong avoid signals for marketing, but older .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Marketing exams feel punitive and book-trivia based, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Projects and multiple exams pile up, sometimes assigned late, creating avoidable crunch.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Personality is friendly, but lectures are often incomplete, disorderly, or at odds with the book.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and a multi-part project rather than lecture mastery.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and ; some intro business sections feel easier and more supportive.

Main concern

and focus on trivial textbook details, with .

What students said

“ book, which created an added factor of difficulty.”
MRKT11
“ and his lectures contradict almost everything in the book.”
MAR11
“ .”
BUSINESS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in class, making them feel unfairly hard.

Book-Based TestsLecture MismatchMultiple ExamsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and can conflict with lectures.

Book-Based TestsLecture MismatchMultiple Exams
“ book, which created an added factor of difficulty.”
MRKT11
“The book.”
MARK11
“I'm a straight "A" student and I barely got C's in his exams.”
MAR11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I'm a straight "A" student and I barely got C's in his exams. and his lectures contradict almost everything in the book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting book-heavy exams, organization issues, and course-dependent praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Effectiveness

45/100

“Lectures are not thorough or orderly.”

📝

32/100

“The book.”

👍 Positive Outliers

80/100

“Great teacher... .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • difficult to approach and .
  • Easy to contact with any problems in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was unnecessarily difficult.
  • barely got C's in his exams
  • the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • He had a tendency to procrastinate.
  • he assigned 4 of the 5 parts of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six mixed reviews from 2005-2008 show a clear course split, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUSINESS11 review
INTROBUS11 review
INTROTOBUS1 review
MAR111 review
MARK111 review
Show 1 more courses
MRKT111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values