AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kaysa Laureano

MATH112 · STAT1 · STATS101 · MATH119 · MATH227 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Solid stats pick if you will do the homework and use her help; watch for tough finals.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient and HelpfulHomework-Based ExamsClear NotesTest Redos AvailableMixed Final Fairness
  • and quiz redos that boost grades.
  • Stats content is manageable if you keep up with homework and notes.
  • A few students slammed long, hard finals that many could not finish.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and test redos help, but you still need to study notes and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Stats is not trivial, and the class pretty easy if .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but one review says do not miss class and lectures matter for tests.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and pass-focused help, despite a few teaching and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and fair grading help students recover, though tough finals can still hurt.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and study of notes/examples are required, without constant overwhelming volume.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and humor; a minority say she knows content but .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework and and a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person stats and math with , and occasional unfairly long finals.

Main concern

and hard enough that even strong students cannot finish.

What students said

“Read and study the examples in her notes and textbook and this class will be an easy A.”
MATH227
“ and ”
MATH227
“The so hard and so unfair that everyone in the class was not able to finish it all.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and notes, with redos available, but and hard to finish.

Homework-Based TestsTest RedosLong FinalIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; redos exist, yet some finals are unrealistic in length.

Homework-Based TestsTest RedosLong Final
“Do the the homework.”
MATH112
“Only 1 person finished it. The top A's in the class couldn't finish it.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Look, statistics isn't the easiest class but I recommend Prof. Laureano because and and I really think she tries hard to get the students to pass her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews (2005-2007), , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Ms.Laureano was so helpful and patient with all the students. and likes it when you ask questions.”

📈 Grade Accessibility

68/100

“Read and study the examples in her notes and textbook and this class will be an easy A.”

⚠️

40/100

“The so hard and so unfair that everyone in the class was not able to finish it all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so helpful and patient with all the students
  • Her notes and and easy to understand
  • doesn't know how to teach it so that everybody understands

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this class will be an easy A
  • and redo tests
  • pretty easy just do the homework

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • ,but she grades very fairly
  • The so hard and so unfair

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen mostly detailed 2005-2007 in-person reviews show consistent themes but are old and lack grade data.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH22710 reviews
2271 review
MATH1121 review
MATH1191 review
STAT11 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values