AI Rate Professor

English

Joelle Mendoza

ENG101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Prefer her in person if possible; online can work if you are self-driven and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGet ready to readCaringInspirationalHilariousMixed online support
  • In person she is energetic, hilarious, and makes reading contagious.
  • one student thrived, .
  • and no textbooks help; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple A/A+ grades with and moderate difficulty ratings suggest strong grade upside with effort.

Online and ; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Reading-heavy but difficulty mostly 2–4 and students describe growth rather than impossible content.

In-person felt a bit harder (4) than online (2).

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory for ENG-101.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two strong yes votes and one negative online support complaint; .

In-person praise is stronger; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

available; grades include A+, A, and .

Format shift

called out in the in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Get ready to read is consistent; otherwise not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Reading load appears across online and in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Engaging, inspirational, and caring for many students, undercut by selective online messaging.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

English writing and reading work dominate; exams are not emphasized in comments.

Format shift

Same assignment-focused picture online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ENG-101 feels warm and fun; , and keeps the class together.

Main concern

Get ready to read and expect .

What students said

“Joelle cared that everybody stayed on course together and got me excited to read some great books.”
ENG-101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG-101 is split: one student became a better writer and retook her; .

Main concern

face.

What students said

“If you send her a instead of every student”
ENG-101
“She is engaging and I am a better writer because of these classes.”
ENG-101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize reading and writing .

Reading heavyWriting focusedExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review highlights reading excitement and .

Reading heavyExtra credit
“got me excited to read some great books”
ENG-101

Online

Online reviews ; focus is writing and Canvas contact.

Writing focusedCanvas messaging
“I am a better writer because of these classes.”
ENG-101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is engaging and I am a better writer because of these classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: Medium.

📖 Reading Contagious

80/100

“You can tell she loves to read, and makes that contagious.”

💬 Online Responsiveness Risk

40/100

“she ”

❤️ Caring & Inspirational

85/100

“Professor Mendoza helped me in PACE program.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • got me excited to read some great books
  • She is engaging
  • Hilarious

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • she
  • I took her twice - English 101 and Comm 101
  • Online class only

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • I am a better writer because of these classes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent reviews across online and in-person with mixed but detailed signals; sample still modest.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG-1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values