AI Rate Professor

Mathematics Science

Kevin Brewer

MATH022 · MATH95 · MATH30 · MATH11 · MATH104 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
27.78%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are already and can self-teach under pressure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyPassive AggressiveSelf Teach RequiredMandatory Attendance
  • Recent reviews overwhelmingly warn against taking him due to harsh testing and discouraging classroom climate.
  • Grades rest almost entirely on tests and .
  • as mandatory and class .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A requires strong test performance under tough grading with .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is rushed, lecture-heavy, and students report needing to teach themselves concepts.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skip-class warnings appear often.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

and recent comments repeatedly say take anyone else.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and students say answers must match the book exactly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but constant tests and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students call lectures confusing, disorganized, or discouraging when questions are asked.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades rest mainly on tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and hard to follow; many students drop or finish with mid grades despite showing up.

Main concern

mid-lecture.

What students said

“ .”
MATH30
“dont take math 11 with him!”
MATH11
“He grades very hard. Pretty sure our class had 50 people when it started and by the there was 10-15.”
MATH022

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and limited time after short lecture coverage.

Test HeavyNo Formula NotesPop QuizzesClosed Style Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; reviews mention no formula notes and rapid testing after few lectures.

Test HeavyNo Formula NotesPop Quizzes
“Not even formula notes for the exam.”
MATH30
“Then we would receive a test after one 1-2 lectures.”
MATH022

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be ready to teach yourself the concepts. He will make you feel like you're wasting his time if you ask him to repeat himself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews spanning multiple math courses. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Good guy, bad professor.”

📝 Test Pressure

32/100

“ , and if you're not a great testing .”

🚫 Recommendation

26/100

“I would suggest taking any other professor than him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very passive-aggressive environment, Sassy responses
  • His lectures were
  • It's like trying to learn math from a puppy on a sugar high.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and quizzes.
  • He grades very hard.
  • because he wants everything done EXACTLY by the book.

Theme 3

🚪 About Retention

  • There was barely any one at the end of the semester
  • The class was full down to 8 people during the final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen detailed reviews spanning 2017-2026 show a positives.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH119 reviews
MATH305 reviews
MATH0222 reviews
MATH1041 review
math951 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

5

C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1