Matthew Dudman

ECON002 · ECON1 · BUS018 · BUS18 · MUSC52 · BUSCOM · ECON001 · ECON2 · BUS005 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 32/100
RMP rating: 3.1/5
Take again: 31.82%
Difficulty: 2.7

The decision

Avoid unless you need the course and can follow every rule without expecting warmth or grade transparency.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHides Canvas GradesNo Late WorkTough PerfectionistLow-Effort LecturesAttendance Heavy

, and slide-reading lectures.
Strict no-late policy and .
Older or self-directed students who follow every instruction can still pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible only by meticulous instruction-following; many report C grades and picky deductions.

Online BUS courses feel picky and homework-heavy; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is standard business/econ difficulty, not brain-burner, but delivery and volume frustrate students.

Online workload spikes with clustered due dates; and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many say roughly 30 percent of the grade is showing up on time with no slack.

In-person is clearly mandatory-heavy; as no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and recent comments emphasize disrespect more than learning value.

Online recent reviews are harsher; a few older in-person students still praise him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and picky deductions dominate recent feedback.

Format shift

Both formats complain about hidden grades; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Clustered assignments, Connect work, papers, and .

Format shift

Online students especially report many items due the same day.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Slide-reading lectures and dismissive tone outweigh occasional praise for .

Format shift

One strong ECON002 in-person review is an outlier against a recent negative wave.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and large attendance/participation share.

Format shift

Online leans Connect modules; in-person adds daily lectures and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person recent , and dull slide lectures; a minority praise clarity.

Main concern

About 30 percent of .

What students said

“Wont let you see your grades in canvas.”
BUS005

“Lectures are dull and .”
BUS005

“Low effort lectures that .”
ECON001

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel outsourced to Connect with , and opaque grades.

Main concern

Slow or belittling communication plus no late work and .

What students said

“Outsources as much of his class as possible to Connect.”
BUS018

“I really don't think he cares about his students.”
BUS018

“he responded to me in a belittling manner”
BUS018

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and papers follow strict criteria; friendliness is low due to .

Multiple ExamsStrict RubricsNo Late SubmissionsNotes Allowed in Some Classes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes; one music class allowed notes, but business/econ feel standard-to-strict.

4 Exams MentionedAttendance WeightedClear Syllabus Rules

“Lectures everyday and like 2-3 required reading/quizzes every twoish weeks. 4 exams.”
ECON001

“Allows you and tests.”
MUSC52

Online

Online and papers more than webcam proctoring details.

Connect HomeworkPapersStrict Deadlines

“2 papers, 2 exams. A ”
BUS018

“He will not accept late .”
BUS005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“If you like being disrespected by a professor, he's perfect. Never again.”
Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews with strong recent online and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Low effort lectures, just readiing the textbook that you already have to read.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“Was one of the .”

🙈 Grade Transparency

20/100

“Wont let you see your grades in canvas.”

📋 Strict Policies

25/100

“no late work accepted for any reason.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Lectures are dull and
Can be demeaning to students who ask questions
He is straight to the point, and elaborates well on the course content

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

I had to fight tooth and nail to get an A!
An A is possible as long as you do everything about the deadlines

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

he responded to me in a belittling manner
and then he's rude about it
if you can't tolerate rudeness!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews with a and consistent policy complaints support a medium-low reputation read.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512

4 out of 57

3 out of 51

2 out of 54

1 out of 511

Course coverage

BUS00510 reviews

BUS0189 reviews

ECON0016 reviews

ECON0023 reviews

ECON12 reviews

Show 5 more courses

945331 review

BUS181 review

BUSCOM1 review

ECON21 review

MUSC521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

A 9

B range

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

C+ 1 · C 5

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 3