AI Rate Professor

Office Technology

Jeanette McCarthy

CIS1 · OFFICETECHNOLO · CIS55 · CIS050 · OT55 · OFFIC0000 · COM10751 · CIS8118 · OT54 · TYPING · CIS066 · CIS001 · CIS01 · OT1 · OT0000 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can devote many weekly hours and follow instructions exactly; otherwise pick another CIS professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOverwhelming Homework LoadVery Specific InstructionsPolarizing PersonalityTime-Consuming LabsOrganized but Strict
  • Content is often doable, but the volume of , and writing makes the class feel crushing for many.
  • Recent Online reviews are especially harsh about rudeness, busywork, and McGraw Hill/SIMNet structure.
  • Older and some dedicated students , and real skill-building if you follow every step.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Many say the A is available if you complete everything on time, but the grind is huge and perfection is expected.

Online recent reviews stress hard work more; some older Online/In person call it an easy A if punctual.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

60/100

Material is often called straightforward or easy, while time cost and volume create the real challenge.

Both formats agree content is easier than the workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

, though some require orientation or participation.

Online is more optional; several In person/older notes treat structure as stricter.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Would-take-again is only about 56% with a loud split between life-changing structure fans and .

Recent Online is more negative; older In person is more mixed-to-positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her forgiving on late work with LARs, others call her a and demands perfect format.

Format shift

Online recent comments lean harsher; some Online praise late-work sympathy.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Repeated reports of 100+ , and 4-20 hour weeks.

Format shift

Both Online and In person hammer the volume, especially Online McGraw Hill/SIMNet.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and fast email help some students, while others find her rude, disengaged, or instruction-heavy without teaching.

Format shift

Online recent quality scores are much lower than many older reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and chapter quizzes more than one big exam.

Format shift

Online is assignment-heavy; older In .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person and older comments mix strong praise for and tough demeanor.

Main concern

and strict instruction-following even when material is not hard.

What students said

“ if you have a job or .”
CIS001
“She is awesome and understanding!”
CIS001
“The material itself was not hard but she gave so ”
CIS001

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply split but recent ones warn of huge McGraw , and unhelpful or .

Main concern

Overwhelming weekly workload and reports of rude or unsupportive communication.

What students said

“The workload is overwhelming, especially if you are taking multiple courses.”
CIS01
“Please, DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS OR ANY CLASS WITH THIS PROFESSOR.”
CIS001
“As long as you are on track with .”
CIS001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly frequent online quizzes and proctored finals.

Chapter QuizzesSIMNet or McGraw HillLab WriteupsInstruction-Strict Submissions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person comments mention midterms and around them.

Midterm and FinalNo Study Guide ReportedWeekly Labs
“she DOES NOT help you out when it comes to the midterm and the final.”
CIS1
“Get ready for , and 2 chapter quizzes.”
CIS001

Online

Online reviews emphasize long chapter question sets, 50-question quizzes, labs, and SIMNet complexity.

McGraw Hill QuestionsLong QuizzesLabs and DiscussionsSIMNet
“Makes you answer almost 100 questions for every single chapter before you have to do a 50 question quiz”
CIS001
“She made class very complicated on simnet.”
CIS066

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please, DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS OR ANY CLASS WITH THIS PROFESSOR.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting workload volume and polarized care/structure opinions. Credibility rating: High.

📦 Workload Shock

16/100

“She gave more work than all my other teachers combined.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She is straight forward and to the point. If you read everything and do the modules in order there is no way to fail.”

⚠️ Student Care Split

35/100

“The professor shows little care for students.”

🅰️ Grade Path

54/100

“This class is a easy A if you do all the homework and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wants us to watch 3 hours of videos on how to turn in an assignment.
  • She answers emails almost immediately!
  • She's a pretty straightforward professor who expects you to follow instructions clearly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work itself is easy. But she makes it feel like you have to go through a jungle
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Materials

  • You are required to buy McGraw Hill, with 100+ questions and long quizzes.
  • Be prepared to spend 4-5 hours doing assignments a week.
  • Lots and lots and lots and lots of labs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with and long-running workload complaints give a solid but polarized picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

CIS00121 reviews
CIS0667 reviews
CIS15 reviews
OT543 reviews
CIS012 reviews
Show 10 more courses
CIS0502 reviews
TYPING2 reviews
CIS551 review
CIS81181 review
COM107511 review
OFFIC00001 review
OFFICETECHNOLO1 review
OT00001 review
OT11 review
OT551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 7 · A 13

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2